In recent social science literature, there has been an increasing number of challenges to the naturalization of state space, in which state spatiality has been seen as a pregiven and relatively unchanging feature of modernity. In this context, one emergent research agendum has been concerned with the production and transformation of state space. More specifically, an increasing number of social scientists have paid attention to the restructuring of territorially demarcated forms of state power, the recent decentring of nationally scaled forms of state activity, and the effects of newly emergent political and state spaces on the nature of urban and regional governance.
The existing literature on rescaling of the state, however, is limited in conceptualizing the diverse and concrete ways in which scalar restructuring of capitalist states takes place in various historical, political and social contexts. This limitation is related to the fact that the bulk of studies conducted on the rescaling of the state have focused on North American and European examples. With these problem orientations, I aim in this article to broaden our theoretical and empirical understanding of state spatiality by addressing spatial processes of state restructuring in the East Asian context. In particular, I am interested in conceptualizing the ways in which the spatiality of top-down regulatory processes led by the developmental state and its associated territorial politics can impact scalar restructuring of the state. More specifically, I will attempt to conceptualize the ways in which 1) the spatiality of top-down regulatory processes led by the developmental state can generate inter-scalar tensions between the national and the local, which results in weakening of the developmental state’s regulatory power, and 2) the state copes with the regulatory deficit through a scalar restructuring of regulation, especially the downward rescaling of the state.
My conceptual argument on the rescaling of the East Asian developmental state will be backed up by a case study on recent decentralization of the decision-making processes with regard to the location of a radioactive waste disposal facility in South Korea. This case study will explore 1) the evolutionary and trialand-error processes through which the Korean government has jumped down the scales of regulation and decision-making from the national to the local, and 2) how the rescaling processes have helped the Korean state to resolve the crisis of regulation with regard to the location of the disposal facility by transforming the national-local scalar tensions to inter-local competitions for the facility.
抄録全体を表示