A data health plan is an implementation plan for the health services provided by medical insurers. To contribute to maintaining and promoting the health of the insured, medical insurers and others must provide health services effectively and efficiently, using health and medical information such as the results of specified health examinations, specified health guidance, and receipt data, among others, in the Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA) cycle. The data health plan was initiated by the Revitalization Strategy of Japan (approved by the Cabinet in 2013). The 1st-term plan for FY2015–FY2017 (3 years), 2nd-term plan for FY2015–FY2023 (6 years) have been completed, and 3rd-term plan for FY2024–FY2029 (6 years) are in progress. The latest guidance for formulating data health plans is contained in the Guidance for Formulating National Health Insurance Health Service Implementation Plan, Guidance for Formulating Health Service Implementation Plan for Older people, and Guidance for Formulating Data Health Plan 3rd Revised Edition, respectively. This study focuses on those for the national health insurance and provides explanations with reference to the abovementioned guidance and other documents.
The 3rd-term data health plan is characterized by standardization. The advantages of standardization include monitoring over time using the same indicators, comparisons with other insurers, and a reduced workload. Standardization includes the standardization of (1) forms, (2) indicators, and (3) the flow of formulation. The flow of formulation involves analyzing the current situation, identifying health issues, and considering and describing objectives, goals, strategies to achieve the goals, and respective health projects. To standardize a form, the sheet of the overall plan is designed to describe the insured’s health issues (priority health issues), objectives in the overall data health plan (including evaluation indicators and target values of the overall plan), strategies to achieve the objectives, and the respective health projects. Common evaluation indicators are provided for national health insurance, wide-area federations for older adults, and health insurance associations.
In addition, the formulation guidance describes points of analysis, an identification of health issues, objectives, targets, and strategies, a cooperation with healthcare professionals, an integrated implementation of health services and care prevention, and a comprehensive community care.
Health insurance associations are promoting initiatives such as data health portal sites, collaborative health, and health scoring reports.
The PDCA cycle is expected to be implemented through actions such as respective health projects to maintain and promote people's health effectively and efficiently.
View full abstract