Temporary stoma construction is often performed during sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal disease, such as low anterior resection. In such cases, a loop ileostomy or loop colostomy is selected. The indications, problems, and points to note of each were examined based on past reports.
There were significantly more high-output stoma, dehydration, renal failure, and peristomal skin problems before closure, as well as intestinal obstruction after closure, in patients with loop ileostomy. In cases at high risk of these complications, loop colostomy was considered to be an option instead of ileostomy. There were significantly more cases of stomal prolapse and parastomal hernia before closure, as well as incisional hernia after closure, in patients with loop colostomy. It is useful to minimize the size of the stomal tunnel of the abdominal wall, which can be the main surgical technique-related cause of these complications. In addition, loop ileostomy was considered to be an option instead of colostomy in cases at high risk of these complications. In conclusion, both loop ileostomy and loop colostomy have advantages and disadvantages, and it is important to use them appropriately so as to make the most of their respective advantages.
View full abstract