In recent years, many condominiums in Japan are facing with the aging of facilities and the increase of elderly residents, and required a variety of repairs and renovations in order to maintain their living environment. On the other hand, due to inactive communities, lack of janitors and conflicts of interest between generations, it is becoming more difficult to form consensus on important matters for managing condominiums. Furthermore, there are cases where some of the residents are in arrears of management costs (including management fee and contribution to repair service fund) or opposing to raising the prices, then even necessary maintenance activities cannot be implemented because of fund shortage. There is also a concern that this situation may lead to “slumism” of condominiums and real estate market crash. As a background of this critical situation, we can theoretically assume a “social dilemma situation” in which individual resident's “short-term pursuit of private interests” conflicts with the community’s “long-term pursuit of public interests” regarding living environment and social relationships as common properties. To improve such a situation, we need measures to reduce non-cooperative behavior and to induce cooperative behavior. In this study, we conducted interviews with managers from two condominiums located in Osaka and Kyoto, both of which have been managed well for many years. We will describe the activities for solving social dilemmas taken in those condominiums and elicit suggestions from the comparison between the two cases. Then, we will discuss what types of empirical scientific research, including modelling and quantitative analysis, should be conducted in the future to help condominium residents find and expand solutions to the dilemma situations.
View full abstract