When non-glutinous rice flour used for karukan preparation was substituted with other starches, differences were observed in the expansion of karukan. In this paper, non-glutinous rice flour was substituted for sago starch, which is expected to improve the utilization and palatability of karukan, and the results were compared with those of karukan made with other starches.
Reference karukan was prepared in a food processor using Yamatoimo (Japanese yam), non-glutinous rice flour, white sugar, and distilled water. Sago, corn, wheat, potato, sweet potato, and cassava were used as starch substitutes for non-glutinous rice flour. Moistures were determined by heat drying method under the atmospheric pressure and viscosities were measured for the crushed Japanese yam by Viscometer. Specific volume of karukan was obtained by dividing the volume using canola seed method by the weight. Texture measurements were performed on the karukan by Creep meter. Sensory evaluation was conducted using a 7-point scoring method to evaluate relative strengths and preference.
Karukan with 100% substitution of sago starch for non-glutinous rice flour was significantly lower preference than the reference in the sensory evaluation. On the other hand, the karukan with 50% sago starch substituted for non-glutinous rice flour did not differ significantly from the reference in terms of all the determined value. Though in terms of preference, the appearance and color items were significantly lower, there were no significant differences in the good texture, taste, hardness, and springiness items. Therefore, the starch replacement ratio was decided to 50% in subsequent experiments. The physical properties of the karukan prepared showed that all starches tended to have higher values for hardness than the reference, while potato and cassava starch had the same level as the reference for adhesiveness, and the other starches had smaller values. The appearance and color of the karukan substituted with sago and cassava starches were lower in the sensory evaluation preferences. This may be due to the light grayish color of sago starch product, while the cassava starch product showed lower swelling, resulting in a gelatinous product with less foams. In the overall evaluation, potato starch was significantly less preferred than the reference and corn starch. However, sago starch showed no significant differences from the sweet potato, wheat, cassava and potato starches. While some panels liked the distinctive light pink color of sago starch karukan, others said it tasted a little astringent. This suggests that improving the taste of sago starch would improve the preference of sago starch karukan.
View full abstract