In present study, we focused on risk trade-off between health and fire risk of Decabromodiphenyl ether (DecaBDE), a well known brominated flame retardant, used in the manufacturing of television sets. We tried to quantify and compare these risks. Firstly, we conducted cost benefit analysis considering human health impacts of DecaBDE use and for both economic and health damage by TV fires. Considering five scenarios, the results suggest that net benefits of DecaBDE use were positive. Secondly, we attempted to re-evaluate the Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) by using available official VSL of five EU countries. All the scenarios yielded net positive results, indicating that the benefits were greater than the costs. Additionally, we tryed to re-evaluate the net benefits of DecaBDE use by replacing the rate of TV fires with using more stringent data. Although it diminished fire rate by 75%, under the most realistic two scenarios, results showed positive net benefits of DecaBDE use. Finally, we compared net benefits by the use of DecaBDE with those of alternative BFRs and bromine-free flame retardants. The results of the latters revealed that use of DecaBDE alternatives increased the costs considerably compared to DecaBDE.
View full abstract