Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
Online ISSN : 2185-4548
Print ISSN : 0915-5465
ISSN-L : 0915-5465
Volume 26, Issue 3
Displaying 1-8 of 8 articles from this issue
Editorial
Papers
Report
  • Michio MURAKAMI
    2016 Volume 26 Issue 3 Pages 141-149
    Published: December 25, 2016
    Released on J-STAGE: February 10, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    At processes of risk communication, it is important to capture the meanings of “safety”, which citizens use in everyday speech. In this study, I focused on the interpretations of safety and reassurance in dictionaries as everyday words, and comprehensively surveyed 18 representative dictionaries (60 when revisions are included) since the Meiji Period to summarize historical changes and current status of them. While reassurance was interpreted from psychological aspects in all the dictionaries, safety had two types of interpretations of the word. The first type of the interpretation contained psychological aspects. It could not be judged whether the second type of the interpretation included psychological aspects or not. There were no significant differences in uses of these types of interpretations in dictionaries between before the World War II and the present. This study highlights that the interpretations of safety are complex and differ among dictionaries.

    Download PDF (453K)
SRA-Japan the 29th Symposium
Topics
  • Yuko KURANARI
    2016 Volume 26 Issue 3 Pages 157-163
    Published: December 25, 2016
    Released on J-STAGE: February 10, 2017
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    The Society for Risk Analysis Japan held a training session in 2004 for the purpose of cultivating skillful risk communicators. The program was very useful to a person who has no experience of risk communication to learn the basics including the concept of risk communication, how to create contents and to present such communication. However, completion of this curriculum does not mean that the skill to actually execute risk communication on site is gained. Executing optimum risk communication should incorporate an appropriate design method based on systematic review. In this paper, by examining failed cases of risk communication, the importance of its design is confirmed. And the need for a training program that incorporates optimum design method is also discussed.

    Download PDF (435K)
Topics
Supplementary Information
feedback
Top