Aiming to register Hidden Christian Sites as world heritage sites in 2016, ICOMOS admitted that the “universal value of Christian practices in Japan was remarkable just as a prohibited religion (hiding) period itself” and it was pointed out that registration in spite of the present condition was very difficult.
In response to this, the Japanese government was forced to take measures, such as the changing of peripheral assets, and other major changes, in the name of heritage. That is, the establishment of a narrative interpretation centering on what is called “negative history,” such as the persecution of believers, oppression, rebellion, suppression, and conflict over conversion, became the biggest barrier to registration.
Therefore, as for the tourism of related peripheral assets, development would also be inevitably seen from that angle. In that case, the technique of dark tourism focuses on the journey of the prayer for negative history, and it would be useful for tourists to obtain prior comprehension and handle those narrative aspects before the tour. On the other hand, the local community, which has shown an understanding of the activity of heritage registration based on the church construction of the revival period, is asked for consideration and their careful acceptance of the technique. In that case, tourism education would be important for mediating between hosts and guests. Based on this acknowledgment, the penetration of the term “Dark Tourism” as a form of science communication, even if dark tourism is not dared to be advocated, can help plan substantial measures. Therefore, both interactions become indispensable.
View full abstract