本研究は、ワークショップに参加する子ども自身の印象（気持ち）とその変化の傾向を定量的にとらえる手法「気持ち温度計」をベースとして、自由参加、随時入退室可能なセルフワークショップにおいて、評価シートのデザインにより回答傾向にどのような差異が生じるかを検証するものである。従来の「温度計」に加え「」「タコメーター」をモチーフとした3種類の評価シートを作成し、これらの記入形式の違いによって回答傾向にどのような差異が生じるのかを明らかにすることを目的とする。今回の分析において、評価シートの記入形式（モチーフ）が異なっても、工程による印象の変化を読み取ることは可能であることがわかった。また、記入時の理解のしやすさ、評定値のばらつき方や有効回答率にはモチーフごとに傾向が見られ、また、その違いは低学年と高学年に分けて分析する事でより明確になった。これらの結果から、特にセルフワークショップにおいては、幅広い学年を対象とする際には温度計、高学年を対象とする際にはタコメーターといったように、参加者に応じて適した記入形式の選択により、より精度の高い調査につながる可能性が示唆された。

抄録全体を表示

The extent of increase in the peripheral circulation of the hamster's buccal pouch by the actions of varying magnetic field of 2 kinds of permanent magnets of different gauss was determined by the advance laser flowmeter·ALF 2100, and the following conclusions were obtained:
1) Control (blood flow in the buccal pouch):
Blood flow of 3.8±0.4ml/min/100 g was observed.
2) Blood flow in the buccal pouch as applied with a magnet of 1200 gauss (9 mmdiameter, 7 mm-height, cylindrical):
Blood flow of 10.2±1.3ml/min/100g was observed with a significant diffecence (p<0.01) from the control.
3) Blood flow in the buccal pouch as applied with a magnet of 1200 gauss (15 mmdiameter, 7 mm-height, cylindrical):
Blood flow of 17.1±1.7ml/min/100g was observed with a significant difference (p<0.001) from the control.
The above results confirmed that a magnet of larger diameter caused more blood flow than that of smaller diameter. It was also revealed that this action of the applied magnet was exerted immediately upon the blood flow and kept this constant regardless of the time, and returned to original values immediately after stopping.

抄録全体を表示

The application of a permanent magnet of 1200 gauss (cylindrical 9 mm in diameter, 7 mm in height) onto the hamster's buccal pouch gave the following interesting results by the laser flowmeter of the peripheral circulatory kinetics according to a change in the combination of polarities (N-pole, S-pole):
1) Group (N-group) of hamsters, whose buccal pouch was subjected to the N-pole of the magnet for one minute and then for nine consecutive minutes.
The application of the N-pole caused an instantaneous increase in blood flow (one minute-value: 10.8±0.4ml/min/100g); this increment was constant, lasting up the ninth minute.
2) Group (NS-group) of hamsters, whose buccal pouch was subjected to the N-pole of the magnet for one minute and immediately thereafter to the S-pole for nine minutes.
The application of the S-pole after the N-pole caused only an increase in blood flow of 0.8±0.2ml/min/100g in one minute, but caused gradual increases up to the ninth minute. However, a significant difference from the N-group (p<0.001) was noted.
3) Group (S-group) of hamsters, whose buccal pouch was subjected to the S-pole for one minute and then for nine consecutive minutes.
The application of the S-pole caused an instantaneous increase in blood flow (one minutevalue: 10.6±0.8ml/min/100g): this increment was constant, lasting up to the ninth minute.
4) Group (SN-group) of hamsters, whose buccal pouch was subjected to the S-pole of the magnet for one minute and immediately thereafter to the N-pole for nine minutes. The application of the N-pole after the S-pole only an increase in blood flow of 0.9±0.2 ml/min/100g in one minute, but caused gradual increases up to the ninth minute. However, a significant diffecence from the S-group (p<0.001) was noted.
The above results revealed increases in blood flow of the buccal pouch for the N-group and the S-group, but not for the NS-group and the SN-group in combination of both poles, rather with significant differences from the N-group and the S-group.
This suggests that the application of a permanent magnet for the purpose of improving the blood flow leads to insuffecient improvement in the peripheral blood flow without due consideration of the combination of polarities.

抄録全体を表示