詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "世界社会フォーラム"
61件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • 桂 敬一
    マス・コミュニケーション研究
    2005年 66 巻 141-143
    発行日: 2005/01/31
    公開日: 2017/10/06
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 世界社会フォーラムの事例
    山田 敦
    国際政治
    2008年 2008 巻 153 号 157-174
    発行日: 2008/11/30
    公開日: 2010/10/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    As the “Battle of Seattle” in 1999 and the later events show, today's anti-globalization movements are not only trans-national but also trans-issue, trans-gender, trans-generation, trans-ideology and trans-culture in nature. This essay tries to explain how and why the movements continue to expand while maintaining the association of such a diverse group of actors like environmentalists, labor unions, human rights activists, students, feminists, farmers, and consumer groups.
    Section One is a conceptual analysis of anti-globalization. Since anti-globalization encompasses variety of meanings that are often vague and/or contradictory, conceptual clarification is a necessary first step for any empirical analyses. The conceptual analysis of anti-globalization requires to specify 1) who are, 2) against what, 3) for what reasons, 4) by which means and 5) to what degree. It is also necessary to conceptually distinguish anti-globalization and anti-globalism, because some actors can be, and actually are, anti-globalization but pro-globalism.
    Section Two is the case study of one of the most widely recognized anti-globalization movements, the World Social Forum. The WSF started in 2001 to challenge the World Economic Forum (known as the Davos meeting). While the WEF is a gathering of pro-globalization leaders of states, business and academics in the North, the WSF is a forum of anti-globalization citizens from all over the world who meet once a year in the South, e.g., Brazil, India and Kenya. The WSF is so diverse in all of the five elements specified in the conceptual analysis that the agendas and interests of its participants are not always in harmony. But they all support the idea, as proclaimed in the WSF Charter of Principles, that “Another World is Possible” if they can replace the neo-liberal globalization with their “alter-globalization.”
    Section Three discusses the result of the case study. The WSF could grow as “the network of networks” by enhancing three linkages among participants. The first is issue linkages; the WSF participants could find some common agendas that connect two or more different issue areas, e.g., the environment, labor, human rights, gender, agriculture and fair trade. The second is the global-local linkages; the WSF could form a “glocal” network by combining numerous local anti-globalization movements at the global level. The third is psychological linkages; the WSF could enhance the “we” feeling among participants by providing them with once-a-year big events of marching and discussions. The WSF does have some weaknesses and dilemmas, but those shortcomings are to be addressed by not only the anti-globalization groups but also the international society as a whole.
  • 後藤 実
    社会・経済システム
    2005年 26 巻 151-162
    発行日: 2005/11/12
    公開日: 2017/07/28
    ジャーナル フリー
    Kyoto Protocol was issued on february 16th, 2005. The purpose of this paper is to consider the meaning of global environmental politics. The meaning is recognized as formation of antagonism. From view point of Luhmann's concepts of risk and immunization, we will classify the issues of global environmental conferences. First, we review the politicization process of global environmental issue and examine the Kyoto Protocol.COP3 reconfirmed the North-South responsabilities. Second, we analize the Johannesburg Summit (WSSD) in comparison to the Rio Summit. WSSD adressed the plan of implementation containing targets and timetable to improve the poverty and condition of environment. From view point of risk, WSSD concerns only calcurable risk and immunization without structural reformation, since the summit did not adopt the Precautionary Principle and preserved the WTO regime. Third,we consider the attempt of World Social Forum (WSF).WSF demonstrates the path to sustainable development and social economic justice, which were made slight of in WSSD. To be sure, WSF questions the divide between risk winner and risk loser. Although the propositions of WSF are introduced into functional system as programme arrangement, the participants of WSF suggest above the functional management, seeking the possibily of Another World against the world of neoliberal globalization. Finally, we suggest that possibilty of Another World relies on impossibility of risk imputation.
  • 第四回世界社会フォーラムの場で考えたこと
    藤岡 惇
    社会文化研究
    2004年 7 巻 58-65
    発行日: 2004年
    公開日: 2020/03/15
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
  • 半田 正樹
    季刊経済理論
    2015年 52 巻 1 号 96-
    発行日: 2015/04/20
    公開日: 2017/04/25
    ジャーナル フリー
  • New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2005, xxiv+360pp.
    野上 裕生
    アジア経済
    2007年 48 巻 5 号 79-83
    発行日: 2007/05/15
    公開日: 2022/12/07
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 清⽔ 達也
    ラテンアメリカ・レポート
    2018年 35 巻 1 号 80
    発行日: 2018/07/31
    公開日: 2019/03/07
    解説誌・一般情報誌 フリー HTML
  • グローバリゼーションと平等指向の自由主義の再生
    遠藤 誠治
    年報政治学
    2006年 57 巻 1 号 41-64,314
    発行日: 2006/11/10
    公開日: 2010/04/30
    ジャーナル フリー
    In the study of International Relations, “equality” has rarely become a sincere research agenda, because the real world is plagued with huge power gap among countries despite the enshrined doctrine of sovereign equality of states. Equality and justice, however, is becoming a pressing political issue in the global political arena comprised by states, international organizations, global business elites, and NGOs and new social movements, just because the disparity between the rich and the poor is widening and the justifiability of the existing world order is at the stake in the heated debates among those actors.
    Given this gap between the silence of IR about the equality and the heated political debated on the equality and world order, this paper tries to explore the way in which the equality and justice is an analytical issue (but not necessarily a normative issue); how the egalitarian world order in the past was maintained and how the order was transformed into the harsh neo-liberal one by a variety of political forces; and how the egalitarian orientation in the global governance could be recreated.
    Referring the Hedley Bull, Yoshikazu Sakamoto, and Karl Polanyi, the second section outlines the relationship between equality and the world order. The third section sketches how the post World War II order based on “embedded liberalism” and “politics of productivity” came into being and how it gives way to exclusive neo-liberal globalization. The fourth section delineates the rise of egalitarian movements in global political arena and assesses the significance of those movements. The concluding section looks at the prospects of more inclusive world order by analyzing the possibility of alliance between the enlightened liberal elites from the rich countries, the equality-oriented international organization, and varieties of counter-globalization movements.
  • *中道 眞
    經營學論集
    2014年 84 巻
    発行日: 2014年
    公開日: 2019/09/27
    会議録・要旨集 フリー

    本稿では、国際経営論におけるグローバリズムの議論の中で、グローバル・ガバナンス論に注目する。それは、世界の諸国家や非国家組織が世界政府をもつことなしに、地球上の諸問題を解決していくためには、いかなるグローバルな秩序を形成していくことが必要であるかをめぐる議論のことである。この議論はグローカリズムが中心となる概念であり、グローバル・ガバナンスからローカル・ガバナンスまでの重層的ガバナンスにおいて、各ガバナンスが強く結びつくことによって機能すると捉える。この結びつきは、当事者間の相互調整による国際ルールの形成とローカルな実施にならざるをえない。

     グローバリズムの重要なプレーヤーの一つは、国際経営を展開する企業である。したがって国際経営論においても、グローバルな視点とローカルな実施が結びついた地球中心的な「規範的コントロール」に移行せざるを得ないことを考察する。

  • 半田 正樹
    季刊経済理論
    2006年 43 巻 1 号 97-
    発行日: 2006/04/20
    公開日: 2017/04/25
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 東アジアからの視角
    大畑 裕嗣
    社会学評論
    2005年 56 巻 2 号 400-416
    発行日: 2005/09/30
    公開日: 2009/10/19
    ジャーナル フリー
    本稿の目的は, グローバル化に対応する社会運動に関する3つの異なった分析枠組 (反システム運動論, ネットワーク社会論, 東アジア市民社会論) における国家/市民社会関係の位置づけを比較検討することを通じて, わたしたちが生きている東アジアという地域の現実により根ざしつつ, グローバル化の時代に即応した, 市民社会論の組み換えへの道を模索することにある.反システム運動論は, 国家と市民社会が明確に区分され, 対抗しあうこともあるという古典的な前提を踏襲しているが, おそらく反グローバル化運動の実態と関連した戦略的計算のため, その点をあまり強調しなくなっている.ネットワーク社会論は, ネットワーク社会における市民社会と国家の位相を相対的に重視せず, 国家/市民社会関係という問題設定をはずして, 社会運動を論じようとしている.つまり, 反グローバル化運動の分析に主に用いられている既存の枠組では, 国家と市民社会は対抗しあうものとされるか, 中心的な分析視座とされていない.これに対し, グローバル化に対応する運動との関連では, まだあまり注目されていない東アジア市民社会論は, 国家と市民社会を相互浸透しあう領域として位置づける.
    現実の反グローバル化運動の中では, 東アジア市民社会論の視角につながるような要請もなされている.東アジア市民社会論は, この地域の特殊性と内部的多様性を宿命として担いつつ, グローバル化に対応するトランスナショナルなネットワークを地域内に形成していくための理論的・実践的課題を追求しつづけるであろう.
  • 近藤 理恵
    日仏社会学会年報
    2012年 21 巻 95-98
    発行日: 2012/03/31
    公開日: 2017/06/09
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 市川 ひろみ
    平和研究
    2012年 39 巻 145-149
    発行日: 2012年
    公開日: 2023/11/24
    ジャーナル フリー
  • −カール・ポランニーのレンズを通して見る社会的連帯経済−
    藤井 敦史
    協同組合研究
    2019年 39 巻 2 号 14-20
    発行日: 2019年
    公開日: 2023/02/03
    ジャーナル フリー
    Social solidarity economy (SSE) concept has gained attention in Japanese civil society these days. Concerning the introduction of SSE concept to Japan, there are some contexts as follows. (1) Looking for alternative economies in the anti-globalism movement, (2) the emergence of community co-operatives, (3) the orientation of "re-mutualization" against "de-mutualization" of Japanese mainstream co-operatives, (4) building inclusive local economy to tackle with social exclusion and poverty problems, (5) the differentiation from the neoliberal thought of social enterprise. When we consider SSE concept from perspective of Karl Polanyi’s economic theory, we can understand (1) SSE mainly develops in the fields of fictitious commodities, (2) SSE needs transparent democratic governance, (3) SSE needs to pursue public interests rather than closed economic interests.
  • グローバルな公共秩序の理論をめざして-国連・国家・市民社会-
    毛利 聡子
    国際政治
    2004年 2004 巻 137 号 138-155,L14
    発行日: 2004/06/19
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    It has been argued that the growth in the number and influence of non-state actors on the international stage is fostering a restructuring of the international order. The adoption of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines, and of the Roma Statute of the International Criminal Court, suggests that non-state actors are in a position to construct global norms in collaboration with like-minded states and international organizations.
    However, the increasingly large and intense protests against globalization over the last 15 years in Seattle, Washington DC, Prague, Genoa and Cancun show that there is mounting anger in some sections of civil society against the current international order based on the neo-liberal economic policies of international economic institutions (IEIs) such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization. Diverse actors in civil society appear to be growing more anxious about the increasing disparity between the rich and the poor, and about the perception that the current policies of the international order are seriously damaging the global environment and civil security. Because the areas in which sovereign states exercise control are shrinking, it has come down to nonstate actors to promote the control of the currently under-regulated corporate globalization, and to propose an alternative global order.
    This article attempts to explore the reasons why civil society could play as an agent for constructing global order. First, the concept of civil society is examined in relation to international politics and the global market. Civil society is taken here to refer to a realm in which various nonstate actors —particularly NGOs and social movements— interact and seek to shape social order. Second, efforts by nonstate actors to democratize the UN system and the Ms are examined in relation to the case for reconstructing the global order. Such efforts to transform the current international political and market orders are analyzed. Third, the World Social Forum (WSF), held annually in opposition to the World Economic Forum, is examined as an emerging instrument of civil society that is searching for more effective ways of constructing the global order.
    In summary, it has become clear that the endeavors of civil society to transform the current international order based on social order are being conducted in the following four ways: by democratizing the UN system and the IEIs through institutionalizing the involvement of civil society; by exerting pressure on private companies to act as responsible corporate citizens; by more effectively linking the protest movements and lobbying of civil society; and by developing alternative policy measures based on social order in contrast with the prevailing neo-liberal economic globalization.
  • 渡邉 英俊
    歴史と経済
    2022年 64 巻 2 号 44-46
    発行日: 2022/01/30
    公開日: 2024/01/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 小西 英央
    平和研究
    2015年 44 巻 144-149
    発行日: 2015年
    公開日: 2023/11/24
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 毛利 勝彦
    国際政治
    2014年 2014 巻 177 号 177_156-177_159
    発行日: 2014/10/30
    公開日: 2015/11/13
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 大屋 定晴
    季刊経済理論
    2013年 50 巻 2 号 43-55
    発行日: 2013/07/20
    公開日: 2017/04/25
    ジャーナル フリー

    In 2011, global mass protests emerged, such as Occupy Wall Street movement. This paper considers how we can locate American anti-capitalist movements within the global justice movement. Since the protest against the 1999 WTO Ministerial Conference, the movements against neoliberal globalization have extended with a great variety, involving anarchists/autonomists. The latter's characteristics are symbolized by "Direct Action" or "horizontalism". Contemporary anarchist discourses (David Graeber, Marina Sitrin, and Massimo de Angelis) and Postmodern Marxism (Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri) have diffused, and we can see their influence on the Occupy movements in the United States. But the global justice movement subsumes the other oppositional wings; NGOs, some Marxist trends, popular education movements in Latin America, etc. Above all, according to Graber, "Marxism has tended to be a theoretical or analytical discourse about revolutionary strategy" and "[a] narchism has tended to be an ethical discourse about revolutionary practice". How then can we understand the relation between the anarchist's "ethics" and the contemporary Marxist's "theory"? How can we relate anarchist-autonomist views with logics of Marxists who have participated in the global justice movement, such as David Harvey and Samir Amin? Starting from this problem, we can derive five points to consider. 1. How to understand the "outside" of capital - Anarchists and Postmodern Marxists emphasize the creation of "outside" of capital. They suggest somewhat spontaneous emergence of the "common", the "outside", as a result of historical transition from industrial to biopolitical economy (Hardt and Negri), or as a process of "value struggles" (De Angelis). But Marxists propose the analysis of conditions of that emergence. Besides theorizing about capital accumulation/circulation process, theories of "co-evolutionary process" (Harvey) and "under-determination" (Amin) are attempts to study the non-economic conditions of "outside" creation. 2. Imperialism - Hardt and Negri regard the concept of "imperialism" as outdated, and De Angelis underestimates it. On the contrary, Harvey and Amin defend its contemporary importance. This opposition is based on the different interpretation of capitalist time-space. Marxists in question focus on the geographical agglomerations of capitalist activities, while Postmodern Marxists and anarchists emphasize the flattening "space" of capital. 3. State - Direct Action's discourses include the equation of state with capital. Hardt and Negri also identify the "Empire" with capitalistic domination, although considering the "nation-state" as obsolesced. Amin and Harvey oppose these opinions, because they consider the state as an institutional place/space where the capital accumulation process relates to, and collides against, the "co-evolutionary process" or "under-determination". So the "territorial logic of power" in states can hinder the demands of capitalist power. 4. Structural dilemma in social movement's organization - Occupy Wall Street tried to become a hallmark of participatory and democratic decision-making. This "horizontalism" could get Marxists consent. However, Harvey is cautious about a "fetishism of organizational form". Because we need "general rules" to resolve problems at wider scale, progressive anti-capitalist movements must accept hierarchical structures. 5. Position of intellectuals - Contemporary social movements include self-education processes. This poses the question about the position of intellectuals. Anarchists and autonomists condemn the leadership of intellectuals as a justification of hierarchical

    (View PDF for the rest of the abstract.)

  • ―「持続可能で包容的な地域づくり教育(ESIC)」の提起 ―
    鈴木 敏正, 佐藤 真久
    環境教育
    2012年 21 巻 2 号 2_3-14
    発行日: 2012/01/31
    公開日: 2013/10/31
    ジャーナル フリー
      The age of globalization could be considered an era of “internalizing” corporate activities and human living and so on, that have been “externalized” and disposed of as has been the case with natural resources and wastes from industry and daily living. In this age without “externalities,” “global environmental problems” and “social exclusion problems” are no longer separate issues; rather they have an intricate and reciprocal relationship. Today, the need for linking these issues and developing them together has emerged in both environmental and development education, which have been involved in the educational aspects of both of these problems. In this article the authors address “global environmental problems” and “social exclusion problems” created as the outcome of “economic globalization” which has exacerbated the mutually prescribed opposition of excesses in wealth and the accumulation of poverty, and they examine environmental education and development education as two educational initiatives working on these problems.
      Based on these initiatives, the authors articulate the perspective of “Endogenous Development”, which aims to solve both of these problems at the same time, as a ‘glocal’ practical theory towards the creation of a “Sustainable and Inclusive Society.” They also articulate the importance of “Education Planning Theory” which promotes proactive learning (self-education activities) related to internal development. In environmental education and development education within the context of globalization, people need to become the problem solving agents through the learning process and participating in knowledge creation. This means not simply understanding and criticizing environmental problems and problems of social exclusion, but protecting a sustainable and inclusive environment in a living community and forming cooperative and creative practical theory will suffice. Lastly, the authors explore the significance and possibility of “Education for Sustainable and Inclusive Communities, ESIC”.
feedback
Top