詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "吉永義信"
81件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • 内田 仁, 鈴木 誠
    ランドスケープ研究
    2001年 65 巻 1 号 41-51
    発行日: 2001/08/31
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
    本稿は二條城二の丸庭園の成立から現在に至るまでの396年間を時代別に調査し, 庭園景及び担った役割の変遷について考察した。その結果 (1) 創建期 (慶長8年~元和9年),(2) 初期庭園景の完成期 (寛永元年~寛永3年),(3) 開放的庭園景への移行期 (寛永4年~正徳5年),(4) 地割確定後の庭園景維持期 (享保元年~寛延2年),(5) 庭園景の衰退期 (寛延3年~文久2年),(6) 庭園景の復活と再衰退期 (文久3年~明治16年),(7) 近代的庭園景の完成期 (明治17年~昭和13年),(8) 近代的庭園景の維持・公開期 (昭和14年~現在) の8つの時代に分け妥当性を得た。二の丸庭園は時代や所有者によって, 庭園景と担った役割が変化し現在に至っていることがわかった。
  • 粟野 隆, エマニュエル マレス
    日本庭園学会誌
    2020年 2020 巻 34 号 34_25-34_34
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2022/04/28
    ジャーナル フリー
    本論文は、森蘊(1905〜1988)の庭園の調査・研究・保存・修理に関する造園活動の日本近現代における位置づけを検討した。明治期から昭和期における庭園史研究の動向や庭園修理の担い手について全体像を把握し、森の諸活動と比較・考察した。その結果、森の造園活動は、(1)庭園と建築とをセットで研究する姿勢が基本であったこと、(2)日本史全体への位置づけを意識した庭園史研究を展開したこと、(3)庭園の地形を重視した実測調査による旧態の考察をおこなったこと、(4)発掘調査知見を先駆的に活用したこと、(5)調査研究から修理に至るまで、歴史的庭園の保存を系統的に実践したこと、という点が特徴と指摘できる。
  • 吉永 義信
    造園雑誌
    1938年 5 巻 1 号 43-47
    発行日: 1938/03/28
    公開日: 2011/04/13
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 李 偉
    ランドスケープ研究
    2005年 68 巻 5 号 373-376
    発行日: 2005年
    公開日: 2006/05/08
    ジャーナル フリー
    Former studies on Koishigawa Koraku-en garden have traced its historical transformation and have obtained good outcomes in investigating its design, and the arrangement and characteristic of its parts. However, these researches have been concentrated on the internal landscape of the garden and the examination of the idea aspect that it bears. The location of Koraku-en and the scenery viewing from the garden have rarely been discussed. Whether or not there is viewing scenery is not only a matter that concerns the appreciations of the garden but also exerts influences on the usage of the garden and the owner's view towards the garden. Without the elucidation of this issue, I suppose that on no account we could properly evaluate the structure and design of Koraku-en. Based on documentary records, especially historical sources written in Chinese, this study examines the location of Koraku-en and discusses whether or not there were acts of viewing towards the outside of the garden and intentional uses of borrowed scenery (Shakkei) in Koraku-en's early days.
  • 高橋 理喜男
    造園雑誌
    1963年 26 巻 4 号 17-23
    発行日: 1963/03/30
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 飛田 範夫
    ランドスケープ研究
    2001年 65 巻 1 号 7-12
    発行日: 2001/08/31
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 平澤 毅
    ランドスケープ研究
    2011年 74 巻 5 号 717-720
    発行日: 2011年
    公開日: 2012/09/05
    ジャーナル フリー
    Meisyoh (places of scenic beauty) and its protection had been important theme for the modern landscape architecture in Japan, but they have not been necessarily examined, because of diversification of research objects and subdividing of research method of landscape architecture, recently. By the way, as for the Places of Scenic Beauty designated under the Law for the Protection of Cultural Properties (1950- ), they have promoted to settle on its management plans in recent years, for their appropriate protection. Such management plans have been settled on since 1973 by mainly local governments with subsidy from the government, and have progressed and achieved many examples. This paper shows the progress and achievements of the management plans for the safeguarding of the Places of Scenic Beauty, and suggests that they should be taken notice from the viewpoints of the landscape architecture, based on the trends concerning cultural properties in Japan; the recent trends like the “Basic Management Plans for the Protection and Conservation of the Historical and Cultural Properties in the Regions” promoted by Agency for Cultural Affairs, or the “Plans for the Maintenance and Improvement of the Beautiful Historical Scenery in the Region” under the “Law for the Maintenance and Improvement of the Beautiful Historical Scenery in the Region”, etc.
  • 内田 仁
    造園雑誌
    1990年 54 巻 5 号 19-24
    発行日: 1990/03/30
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
    二條城本丸庭園の作庭の変遷については, 京都市二條城事業係が建築的側面より紹介している。だがその詳細については断片的にしか研究されていない。そこで本研究は本丸が造られた寛永年間から現在の本丸庭園が完成した明治28年までの作庭の歴史的な変遷を考察することを目論んだ。寛永年間の本丸庭園はその資料が全くなく不明であり天明8年本丸御殿焼失と共に崩壊し幕末を迎えた。幕末・明治初期には茶庭が存在していたが建物の老朽化が激しく明治14年取り壊された。明治27年旧桂宮邸の一部が本丸へ移築されその際売泉水庭園が作られた。明治28年には芝生を主体とした外国の影響とも思える庭園に大改造され現在に至る築山風庭園が完成された。
  • 吉河 功
    日本庭園学会誌
    1996年 1996 巻 4 号 14-21
    発行日: 1996/03/31
    公開日: 2011/05/20
    ジャーナル フリー
    水戸徳川家江戸上屋敷庭園であった後楽園 (東京都文京区) は、江戸の庭園文化を代表する大名庭園でありその文献史料も他庭と比較してかなり豊富である。
    しかしながら、各史料を検討しても、なお様々な未解決の問題が残されていることは否定出来ない。古庭園で、作庭当初のままの景が今日まで保存されているものは極く少ないということは常識であって、大部分が多かれ少なかれ何等かの改修を受けている。
    その庭園が各時代をどのように変遷してきたかという問題は、古庭園研究上の重要な課題である。
    ここでは後楽園の多くの疑問点の内、園内西部の重要な景観である「小盧山」の景中にある、「大堰川」の流れを中心とした部分の「渡月橋」と「西湖堤」について考察し、その変遷を文献と実地の上から明らかにしていきたいと思う。
  • 丹羽 鼎三
    造園雑誌
    1940年 7 巻 3 号 128-136
    発行日: 1940/12/28
    公開日: 2011/04/13
    ジャーナル フリー
    上來縷述するところを、要約すれば、次の如し。
    (一) 作庭形式上より、日本庭園を分つて、整形・寫景・寫意の三類に大別する。但、茲に云ふ整形庭園は、西洋在來のものとは、大いに趣を異にし、僅かに庭園の地割に於て、中軸の左右に、地區的對象を成すに過ぎない。
    (二) 寫景庭園は、日本に於ける庭園の、主流を成すものにして、筆者の所謂、林泉・縮景・借景・路地の諸庭園、之に屬す。庭上の自然の再現に關しては、東・西其の理念を異にすと難も、西洋在來の風景庭園、略之に當る。
    (三) 寫意庭園は、日本に於てのみ見らるるものにして、庭上に使用せられたる、作庭資料の示現する景觀により、引き起されたる聯想が、觀者を、形而上の或る境地に到達せしむる様、意匠工夫せられたる庭園である。所謂、枯山水庭園・吉鮮庭園は、是が適例として擧げらるる。
    (四) 寫意庭園は、其の意匠・手法の非寫實的・非羅列的・非読明的なるを、特徴とす。從而、此の種庭園を觀賞するには、觀者が、よぐ作者の意圖するところを理解し、其の庭園の持つ風格と、形而上の意義と、而して因て來るところの面白さとを、味得し得る丈の藝術的素養を、備へて居らなければならない。
  • 小石川後楽園得仁堂に関する考察 その1
    奥村 俊道, 勝又 英明
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2017年 82 巻 737 号 1783-1792
    発行日: 2017年
    公開日: 2017/07/30
    ジャーナル フリー
     This paper is a study on the construction and subsequent history of Tokujin-do at Koishikawa Korakuen Garden, a site designated as a Special Historic Site and a Place of Special Scenic Beauty, located in Bunkyo Ward in Tokyo. Tokujin-do was reroofed and partially repaired from December 2012 to March 2014, during which time the building was examined from both an architectural and historical point of view.
     Until now, Tokujin-do was thought to have been built by Tokugawa Mitsukuni (1628-1701), the second feudal lord of Mito Domain, as a worship hall dedicated solely to Boyi and Shuqi, two ancient Chinese wise men he revered. However, historical sources have revealed that it was actually rebuilt during the period of July 1665 (Kanbun 5) to January 1668 (Kanbun 8) to enshrine the images of Boyi and Shuqi, which had originally been placed in Isei-do, together with the image of Taibo formerly enshrined in Shitoku-do. Furthermore, after the death of Mitsukuni, the name of the building was changed firstly to Koshi-do, then to Shaka-do. After 1718 (Kyoho 3), the name was changed again to Hachiman-do when the God Hachiman was transferred from Sanuki, the hometown of Munetaka, who was the fourth feudal lord of Mito Domain. Later in 1820 (Bunsei 3), the building enshrined solely the images of Boyi and Shuqi, changing its name once again to Tokujin-do. At this time, the images of Boyi and Shuqi together with the image of Taibo, which had until then been stored in a different place, were lost in a fire; thereafter the images of Boyi and Shuqi were made anew.
     As stated above, so far, the changes made to Tokujin-do have by and large been revealed purely from the analysis of historical sources and not from an architectural study of the building itself. Therefore, the building was architecturally examined with a focus on and around the alcove where the images were enshrined in order to shed light on the history of Tokujin-do. The following points were made clear in the study. 1. At the time of construction, the width of the frontage of the alcove was 2 bays with one circular pillar to the east of the center of the building. The western side of the alcove was wide and shelves were placed on the eastern side. 2. In the mid-Edo period, the alcove was renovated by replacing the original circular pillars with 2 new circular pillars and changing the width of the frontage to 1 bay. 3. In the late Edo period, the ornamental beam was raised and the sheets of timber that constituted the side walls were removed. 4. The renovation process of the alcove is not inconsistent with the placement and removal of the images that occurred according to historical sources.
     From this study, it is evident that the history of the enshrined images and the renovation process in and around the alcove is divided into 3 periods: 1. At the time of construction from 1665 to 1668 (Kanbun 5 to 8): Taibo, Boyi, Shuqi 2. From 1718 (Kyoho 3) onward: God Hachiman 3. From 1820 (Bunsei 3) to the present: Boyi, Shuqi.
  • 進士 五十八
    造園雑誌
    1970年 33 巻 4 号 19-27
    発行日: 1970/03/29
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
    The artistic design of Japanese garden which is characteristic of the form of Japanese garden can be seen in the environment of “Senzui Kawaramono's” life.
    The beauty of Japanese garden was a condensed expression of artistic and creative energy that was depend on the poor people “Kawaramono”.
    This opinion denies the common theory of the history of Japanese garden.
    That is; the important fact which formed the typical part of the form of Japanese garden is the idea of Buddhistism and Horai, Shinsen.
    It insists about the fatal life of “Kawaramono” who was a subjective performance of activity of creating garden.
    That is; it was a production of view of art and creative energy which is cultivated in the lowest life.
    The comment of thesis is below.
    1. The problem about the general view of garden of the theory of Japanese culture.
    2. Denying form in origin by religion.
    3. Observation on relation between thought and works.
    4. Observation on subjction of origin.(→Man equal “Kawaramono”)
    5. Condensed expression of artistic energy which “Kawaramono” influenced the life environment and limit of social activity.
    6. Observation abort “Kawaramono's” view of nature and view of art.
    7. Material obsetvation of the artistic design and nature.
    Still more the aim of this thesis is to break down the view of Japanese garden which prevents of scientification of modern landscape gardening and is inclined to emphasis upon thought.
  • 永井 良枝
    造園雑誌
    1978年 42 巻 1 号 2-9
    発行日: 1978/08/30
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
    Because few gardens built during the He ian period remain today, our knowledge of the details of the gardens of those days is very poor. It is well accepted that we can use old tales as materials for h istorical study, because these tales sometimes reflect not only the life style of the period, but also historical facts.
    There are many descriptions of gardens in The Tale of Utsuho, one of the oldest novels in Japan, said to have been written at the end of 10th century. This study is an attempt to clarify the characteristics of garden design at that time, through an analysis of this tale. Only three main gardens are discussed in this essay, although about fifteen gardens were described in the tale.
    1) The hero of the tale lived with his mother in the hollow of four big trees, “Utsuho”, during his childhood. Although it was located in the heart of the northern mountains, far from Kyoto, there was a large open area with some mounds, a spring and a rill, arranged like a house garden, in front of the hollowed trees (Fig. 1).
    Therefore, it can be assumed the artificial hills, springs and ‘Yarimizu’ (a rill led into a garden) were already included in the extensive gardens of the noblemen of that period.
    2) “Kyogoku-Residence” in Kyoto belonged to the hero's grandfather. Eventually the hero reconstructed this residence to enjoy the four seasons, quietly, and to teach his daughter to play the Koto.
    The Shinden mansions and the garden-buildings such as the ‘Ro’ (End-pavilion), ‘Tsuri-dono’ (Shorepavilion), ‘Sori-hashi’ (arched bridge) and ‘Mido’ (Shrine) had both Japanese and Chinese characteristics (Fig. 3, Fig. 4).
    The existence of both Chinese and Japanese styles in the garden implies that the middle of the Heian period (the 10th century) was probably a transitional stage in the development of the Shinden style garden.
    It is worthy to note that the word ‘Izumi-dono’ (Spring-pavilion) is used in this tale, although Dr. Mori writes that this word was used for the first time in an old document in 1083.
    3) “Fukiage-Palace” was constructed near the Fukiage shore, which is now considered to be situated in Wakayama city (Fig. 5).
    The ‘Garden of Four Seasons’ was one of the important garden types which occurred in the Heian period. This is thought to have been developed under the influence of the Theory of Onyo-Gogyo or the natural surroundings of Kyoto. In the Garden of Four Seasons at the Fukiage-Palace, Spring Hill, Summer Shade, Autumn Grove and Pine Forest areas were located in the east, south, west and north sections of the garden, respectively.
    Dr. Yoshinaga writes that the Jodo garden was created in the late Heian period by some priests in order to strengthen their aspirations to faith. However, the auther of this tale described the Garden of the Fukiage-Palace as the Paradise in the West. This implies that the noblemen in the late 10th century, supported by their religious longing, attempted to make their gardens after the Paradise in the West. Accordingly, the Gardens of the Fukiage-Palace can be considered as a prototype of Jodo style garden.
  • 木村 三郎
    造園雑誌
    1936年 3 巻 1 号 1-7
    発行日: 1936/03/31
    公開日: 2011/04/13
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 管野 義胤
    造園雑誌
    1948年 12 巻 2 号 9-14
    発行日: 1949/04/01
    公開日: 2011/04/13
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 特に創成期・頼房、光圀時代について
    中島 宏
    日本庭園学会誌
    2002年 2002 巻 10 号 33-51
    発行日: 2002/12/28
    公開日: 2011/05/20
    ジャーナル フリー
    本研究の目的は、江戸時代を代表する国指定文化財庭園を対象に、植栽樹木の特徴と推移を探り、管理のあり方を提案することである。このような目的で小石川後楽園を調査した結果、この庭園は水戸家の徳川頼房時代に着手し、徳川光圀時代に完成したことが分かった。そこで、創成期の庭園における植栽の構成について考察した。その結果、(1) 既存の地形や自然を保全しながら地割や意匠をしており、それらを四つのタイプに分けることができた。(2) 頼房は将軍家光や徳大寺との関わりのなかで作庭記の技法により京都付近の名勝等を、光圀は舜水との関わりのなかで儒教の精神により中国風の意匠等を取り入れ、植栽構数成をしていることを明らかにした。
  • 吉川 需
    造園雑誌
    1949年 13 巻 2 号 7-20
    発行日: 1950/03/31
    公開日: 2011/04/13
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 内田 仁
    造園雑誌
    1993年 57 巻 5 号 7-12
    発行日: 1993/03/31
    公開日: 2011/07/19
    ジャーナル フリー
    本研究は明治末期・大正中期・昭和期の平面図及び『明治廿八年度臨号明細書』の添附絵図面や明治29年頃・昭和15年の写真等を基に近代における二條城本丸庭園の地割・植栽の経年変化について考察した。明治29年当初から基本的な地割及び庭園景に変化はなかった。但し, 現在では築山に登る園路は保存状態に変化が生じてきた。現在の植栽形態は竣工当時と比べ, 樹木が覆い茂り変貌してしまったようにもみえるが, 昭和15年とはほぼ近いものであった。明治29年頃や昭和15年の多聞塀跡は現在のように常緑樹には覆われていない。
  • 江山 正美
    造園雑誌
    1959年 23 巻 3 号 14-18
    発行日: 1960/02/29
    公開日: 2011/04/13
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 張 平星, 深町 加津枝, 柴田 昌三
    ランドスケープ研究
    2017年 80 巻 5 号 437-442
    発行日: 2017/03/31
    公開日: 2017/09/13
    ジャーナル フリー

    Areas with white sand are characteristic of temple gardens in Kyoto, but the halt of the production of Shirakawa-suna (sand obtained from local white granite) in the 1980s led to their change or loss. This study aimed to clarify the position and expressive form of white sand areas qualitatively and quantitatively, and to grasp their characteristics in the garden composition of different periods. Based on 18 garden-related documents, we selected 68 gardens with white sand areas which were built no later than the Showa period. Then we conducted field investigations and calculated the occupancy rates of white sand areas in each garden. Most gardens were built in Edo or Showa era, belonging to the Rinzai School. Three positions (the whole garden, the front of garden and the middle of garden) were found. The white sand areas in main Front gardens of hojo abbot’s quarters showed the highest average occupancy rates, followed by other gardens of the hojo, and gardens of shoin study hall. Raking patterns were found in over 90% of gardens, while sand terrace and sand pile were seen in 8 gardens. Combination with other elements such as stones and moss was found in 36 gardens. The white sand gardens were formed in Muromachi era, developed in Edo era, decreased from Meiji era, and rose again in Showa era while the ritual function of hojo front gardens started to decline.

feedback
Top