Chapter 1: The purpose of this study is to clarify the type of building arrangement and the factors of spatial formation of Okura-syo owned by Daisyoji Domain that was a branch family of Kaga Domain: head family of the Maeda Family. The Okura-syo for collecting the tax rice in the Daisyoji Domain territory were four places. But, only an Okura-syo in Nagamachi of the Daisyouji Castle Town was maintaining a form of Okura-syo. Also, there is the detailed historical materials on the spatial formation of Aramachi-Momikura-syo that stocked the "rice in the husk" for famine relief. From the above, Idecided to take up the Aramachi-Momikura-syo as an object of this study, and to compare the Nagamachi-Okura-syo with the Aramachi-Momikura-syo.
Chapter 2: The previous studies and the procedure of this study were shown.
Chapter 3: The spatial structures (history, elements of spatial structure, building arrangement and architectural elements of Okura) of the Nagamachi-Okura-syo and the Aramachi-Momikura-syo were shown, and I examined commonality between the two. Those elements of spatial structure were the same. As for the building arrangement, there was a period when both Okura-syo became the parallel C type. Technique of spatial design of Okura-syo in Daisyoji Domain was considered as follows. First, two or three storehouses form the center part, then new storehouses are built as surrounding a storehouse that is near to front gates. A group of buildings formed a square shape by the above technique. There were several partitions and an entrance hall in Okura. The entrance hall in front of the Okura was a depth of about 3.6 meters, and was connecting all the doors of Okura. From the above, in the case of the Daisyoji Domain, it was considered that the spatial structure of Okura-syo which collected tax rice and the spatial structure of Momikura-syo which stocked the "rice in the husk" for famine relief are the same.
Chapter 4: I compared the Okura-syo owned by Disyoji Domain and the Okura-syo (parallel C type) owned by Kaga Domain, and clarified the characteristics of the former. The elements of spatial structure were the same, but the shape of group of buildings were different. The reason was considered the difference of technique of spatial design mentioned above. In addition, each Okura had a name (center, direction) which mean the position of building in the premises. Such name was seen only in the Okura-syo owned by Daisyoji Domain. In the case of the Aramachi-Momikura-syo, an Okura located at the center of the premises was called “left Storehouse”. But, “left Storehouse” formed the center part with “Right Storehouse”. And, at the other Okura, the name meaning the position of building in the premises was seen. I could find out such centrality of the Okura-syo owned by Daisyoji Domain. On the other hand, the characteristics about the entrance hall of Okura were not seen.
Chapter 5: In conclusion, the building arrangement of Okura-syo owned by Daisyoji Domain was formed by technique of spatial design that was different from Okura-syo owned by Kaga Domain. For this reason, we categorized the Daisyoji-Okura-syo as Daisyoji-han type. The factor of spatial formation was the spatial consciousness called the centrality.
抄録全体を表示