The aim of this paper is to investigate the roles which the concept of dependency plays in current regime of the self, through articulating self-governance of people, with rationalities
and
technologies of political power. Nikolas Rose
and
others argue that, over the last two decades, proliferation of
psy
-expertise has been intrinsically linked with the emergency of new political rationalities in comtemporary liberal democracies, which they call "advanced liberal government". In this new governmental regime, the articulation of "therapy culture"
and
"enterprise culture" provide important means to link conduct of the self with the conduct of others.
The concept of dependency is often said to be chaotic
and
is object of controversies among various
psy
-experts
and
other experts. However people have increasingly come to understand
and
act on themselves through the concept of dependency. Problems of dependency are important elements of "therapy culture".
In origin, the concept of dependency was understood to be related to alcohol
and
drugs. Dependents were 'deviant' minorities. But, since 1980's, this concept comes to have connection to many other objects. Today, dependents are regard to be dependent on not only substances but also various objects, actions,
and
processes, like sports, sex, shopping, eating , gambling, love, computer, etc.. The experts of dependencies emphasize that everyone can be pathological dependents. This transformation of the concept extend the fields of intervention of
psy
-expertises.
Our exercises of freedom come to be problematized in termes of dependency. When one is dependent, he can not be thought to exercise his freedom in proper way.
Psy
-experts insist that to recover from the state of dependency, they need to recover from all sorts of dependeicies. This concept enable
psy
-experts to intervene everyday practices of lay people to shape them as free-rensponsible subjects of choice.
抄録全体を表示