C. S. T. のPredominant Response Colorによる人格の診断

松岡 武

doi:10.4992/jjpsy.25.83

松岡武

著者情報

ジャーナルフリー

1954 年 25 巻 2 号 p. 83-92

DOI https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.25.83

詳細

発行日: 1954 年受付日: 1954/02/24 J-STAGE公開日: 2010/07/16 受理日: - 早期公開日: - 改訂日: -
訂正情報
訂正日: 2010/07/16 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文抄録訂正内容: 訂正前 : 被験者の反応のうち最も多く現われる色彩を, P. R. Cと呼び, その性質を吟味して下のような事実を確かめることがでぎた。
(1) 不良少年, 神経症, 分裂病患者を含めた異常者群の示すP. R. C. と学生のそれとを比較検討することによつて, つぎのことがわかつた。すなわち2-12, 16-5, 13-7, のP. R. C. は健康なパーソナリテイを, 91, 3のP. R. C. は不健康なパーソナリテイを示している。
(2) 神経症患者の特色は9に加えるに, 2-12, および無彩色分裂病患者の特色は9に加えるに13-7, 15不良少年の特色は9に加えるに3, (1) のP. R. C. を持つ所にある。
(3) C. S. T. 異常点による診断結果と, P. R. C. による診断結果とは, ほぼ一致する。それゆえ人格を簡単に診断するにはP. R. C. による方法で足りる。
(4) 年令にしたがい, 被験者が持つP. R. C. の内容は若干異つてくるが, 男女差は見られない。
(5) P. R. C. は被験者の色の好みによつて左右されないようである。
(6) 再テストにおけるP. R. C. の恒常性の吟味によつて, 絶対的な一致率は低いが, 相対的一致率はかなり高いことを知つた。また第1回テストで異常P. R. C. を示した者については再テストによる吟味が必要であることを知つた。
なおわたくしは最近の研究によつて, 躁ウツ性, ヒステリー性, テンカン性, 神経質, 分裂性性格に特有なP. R. C. を見出すことができ, それを用いてこれらの性格の診断をかなり正確にでぎることを知つた。近く第2報告として発表いたしたいと思つている。

訂正日: 2010/07/16 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文抄録訂正内容: Right : While we were testing many persons by C.S.T., we found the following fact : Each subject has his particular response colors which concentrate upon specific colors. We called such colors “Predominant Response Colors” (P.R.C.).
We tested chiefly abnormal groups (the neurotic, the schizophrenic, the delinquent boys) and contrasted the frequency of appearance for each P.R.C. in abnormal groups with that in normal groups (pupils of junior and senior high schools and college students.)
By this procedure, we tried to find out the P.R.C. peculiar to abnormal presonality. The results were as follows :
(1) Fig. 1. is the graphic presentation of the frequency of the P.R.C. in both normal and abnormal groups. It shows that P.R.C. 9. (red), 1. (white) and 3. (black) were predominant among the abnormal group, while P.R.C. 2, 11, 14, 12, (the group of pink, orange, yellow, light yellow green) 16, 10, 5 (the group of green, light blue green, blue) and 13, 8, 7 (the group of blue violet, purple, red violet) were predominant among the normal group.
These differences were statistically significant, with the exception of P.R.C. 2, 11, 14, 12. (Table 6)
(2) After the analysis of the appearance of the P.R.C. in each abnormal group (show in Fig. 2), it was found that P.R.C. 9 of each abnormal group was more predominant than that of any normal group.
Consequently, P.R.C. 9 is considered to be the fundamental key to determine whether a given personality is normal or abnormal.
It was found, moreover, that P.R.C. shown in Fig. 3. were peculiar to each abnormal group. Fig. 3 show that those who have P.R.C. 13, 8, 7, 15, in addition to P.R.C. 9, are the schizophrenic personality.
(3) By measuring the relationship between subjects' P.R.C.'s and their color preference, it was found that the P.R.C. was not determined by the subjects' color preference.
(4) P.R.C. 9, and 1, were predominant among the persons evaluated as abnormal by C.S.T. abnormality mark, while P.R.C. 2, 11, 14, 12, and 16, 10, 5, were predominant among the persons evaluated as normal by the same norm.
Therefore, the evaluation by. C.S.T. abnormality mark nearly agrees with the evaluation by the P.R.C.
(5) We contrasted the frequency of the P.R.C. in the male group with that in the female group, but no sex difference was found.
The degree of Masculinity and Feminity therefore cannot be diagnosed by this method.
From the above mentioned results, we may conclude that the P.R.C. can be utilised as the simplified diagnostic method of personality.

抄録

While we were testing many persons by C.S.T., we found the following fact : Each subject has his particular response colors which concentrate upon specific colors. We called such colors “Predominant Response Colors” (P.R.C.).
We tested chiefly abnormal groups (the neurotic, the schizophrenic, the delinquent boys) and contrasted the frequency of appearance for each P.R.C. in abnormal groups with that in normal groups (pupils of junior and senior high schools and college students.)
By this procedure, we tried to find out the P.R.C. peculiar to abnormal presonality. The results were as follows :
(1) Fig. 1. is the graphic presentation of the frequency of the P.R.C. in both normal and abnormal groups. It shows that P.R.C. 9. (red), 1. (white) and 3. (black) were predominant among the abnormal group, while P.R.C. 2, 11, 14, 12, (the group of pink, orange, yellow, light yellow green) 16, 10, 5 (the group of green, light blue green, blue) and 13, 8, 7 (the group of blue violet, purple, red violet) were predominant among the normal group.
These differences were statistically significant, with the exception of P.R.C. 2, 11, 14, 12. (Table 6)
(2) After the analysis of the appearance of the P.R.C. in each abnormal group (show in Fig. 2), it was found that P.R.C. 9 of each abnormal group was more predominant than that of any normal group.
Consequently, P.R.C. 9 is considered to be the fundamental key to determine whether a given personality is normal or abnormal.
It was found, moreover, that P.R.C. shown in Fig. 3. were peculiar to each abnormal group. Fig. 3 show that those who have P.R.C. 13, 8, 7, 15, in addition to P.R.C. 9, are the schizophrenic personality.
(3) By measuring the relationship between subjects' P.R.C.'s and their color preference, it was found that the P.R.C. was not determined by the subjects' color preference.
(4) P.R.C. 9, and 1, were predominant among the persons evaluated as abnormal by C.S.T. abnormality mark, while P.R.C. 2, 11, 14, 12, and 16, 10, 5, were predominant among the persons evaluated as normal by the same norm.
Therefore, the evaluation by. C.S.T. abnormality mark nearly agrees with the evaluation by the P.R.C.
(5) We contrasted the frequency of the P.R.C. in the male group with that in the female group, but no sex difference was found.
The degree of Masculinity and Feminity therefore cannot be diagnosed by this method.
From the above mentioned results, we may conclude that the P.R.C. can be utilised as the simplified diagnostic method of personality.

責任著者(Corresponding author)

訂正情報

J-STAGEへの登録はこちら（無料）