抄録
The present study explored the effects of subjects' own inputs on their opinions on allocation and interpersonal attraction for others who advocated opinions on reward allocation. The main hypotheses were that high-input subjects would prefer equal to equitable allocation but evaluate others favoring equity better than those favoring equality, while low-input subjects would prefer equitable to equal allocation but evaluate others favoring equality better than those favoring equity. Subjects participated in a 4-person dilemma game, and received the scores of four members. Then they were asked for their opinions on allocation publicly, and were provided with mediumminput members' allocation choices for the rating of these members' impressions. The results generally supported the main hypotheses. Although the subjects who chose self-interested allocation liked the members favoring allocation to their advantage better than those favoring allocation to their disadvantage, the subjects who chose modest allocation liked the former as well as the latter in spite that they evaluated the latter as fairer than the formers.
