Because interventional radiology (IVR) procedures are being performed with increasing frequency, patient X-ray exposure dose for X-ray fluoroscopic and radiographic procedures should not be ignored. In order to avoid excessive X-ray exposure, exposure dose rate limits are specified in the Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) and by civil law at 50 mGy/min for usual fluoroscopy and 125 mGy/min for high-dose fluoroscopy. In the present study, we examined the difference in patient incident dose rate before and after using an X-ray generator that satisfied the above requirements. For incident dose to the image intensifier (I. I. ), we investigated the differences between continuous and pulsed fluoroscopy, the effects of additional filters (Ta : tantalum, Al : aluminum), and the form of the X-ray spectrum. For pulsed fluoroscopy using PMMA (polymethyl-methacrylate), the maximum patient incident dose rates of usual and high-dose fluoroscopy were 59 mGy/min and 151 mGy/min, respectively. With regard to I. I. incident dose, saturation was observed beginning at a PMMA of 20 cm, and the X-ray dose was insufficient. In terms of the difference in patient incident dose rate with Ta and Al filters, the dose rate with the Ta filter was approximately 50% lower than that with the Al filter except for the saturation area. Concerning the X-ray spectrum, it was considered that a Ta filter not only minimizes patient X-ray exposure (because Ta reduces soft X-rays more effectively than Al) but also minimizes scattered X-rays because it filters out hard X-rays, leading to improved image quality. However, the use of the filter is appropriate only when a sufficient I. I. incident dose can be ensured. Specifically, the use of the filter under saturation conditions can lead to deterioration in image quality. Therefore, IVR X-ray systems must be equipped with an appropriate filter for reducing X-ray exposure while maintaining a sufficient I. I. incident dose rate.
