The process for formulating a river management program in Japan has greatly changed. In 1997, the River Act was amended and, shifting from the conventional purpose of flood-control and irrigation, a comprehensive river management program was drawn up with the purpose of flood control, irrigation and environmental conservation. Here, for the first time, participation by residents was introduced, thereby reflecting their opinions. In the Kansai area, the Revised River Act was applied for the Yodogawa water system, and the Yodogawa Water Basin Council, consisting of academic experts and publicly recruited residents was established by the government and a Yodogawa water management program was formulated. However, during the formulating process, the four governors of Mie, Shiga, Kyoto and Osaka prefectures expressed their objections to the Daido dam construction in Shiga prefecture from the standpoint that flood prevention by river improvement should be prioritized over dam construction. On the other hand, the pro-Daido dam group insisted that the government complete construction of the dam. Consequently, the once simple interests of upper reaches and lower reaches residents, have developed into complex ones involving the project implementing body i.e. the national government, and the beneficiaries i.e. prefectures, municipalities, and local residents, resulting in a conflict concerning eliciting of an agreement. Based on such experience, I will discuss how to adjust interests regarding river management programs and the direction of local governments in the future.
View full abstract