The assumption that beech (Fagus sylvatica) cutting is more dangerous compared to spruce (Picea abies) and fir (Abies alba) trees, due to its complex and asymmetric tree crown characteristics, variety of branch dispositions, lengths, and thickness, and often swept trunk, was tested. The accidents, which occurred to concessionaire workers in Slovenian State Forests, in the period 1999-2005, were analysed. Out of 999 forest accidents, 528 of them occurred during cutting, out of which 475 occurred during cutting of beech, spruce and fir trees. The index I_k, i.e. risk ratio of accidents with reference to cut volume, and the index I_d, i.e. risk ratio of the number of trees cut as a reference to the accident, showed that the accident risk during cutting of beech trees was 1.1 times (I_d) and 1.5 times (I_k) higher than that for spruce and fir. According to both indices (I_d and I_k), the risk was higher during wedging (1.3 and 1.9), back-cutting (1.6 and 2.3), and bucking and cross-cutting (2.0 and 2.9), respectively. When clearing the lodged trees and delimbing, the risk was according to index I_k higher with beech trees at 1.4 and 1.2, whereas it is lower at 1.0 and 0.8 under index I_d, respectively. In general, the I_k index showed higher accident risk than I_d. The reason for this could be explained by the long work durations of beech trees in spite of lower volume per tree of beech trees which has short assortments. The results are useful for selecting safety work measures in terms of preliminary safety education and work preparation for control and work organization.
View full abstract