With the view of obtaining the patho-physiological analysis of chronic pulmonary diseases, the respiratory variations in intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures and their interrelations were studied in 30 patients with chronic pulmonary diseases and in 10 normal subjects.
Intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures were measured with an air-filled flaccid latex balloon in the stomach and esophagus, respectively. The respiratory variations in intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures were recorded simultaneously.
1) The mean value of the respiratory variations in intra-abdominal pressure at rest, in sitting position, was 5.1cm H
2O in 30 patients which was not significantly different from that in normal subjects (Fig. 3).
2) In the most cases of pulmonary patients, the patterns of intra-abdominal pressure revealed no parallel relation with those of ventilatory volume, this being different from the result in normal subjects.
3) The respiratory variations of the intra-abdominal and intra-thracic pressures, at rest and during voluntary hyperventilation, were analysed from the stand points of the magnitude, the direction and the time lag, and the following four groups were noticed (Fig. 7):
Group I: The respiratory movement of intra-abdominal pressure was inverse in direction to that of intra-thoracic pressure, while the time lag and the magnitude difference between these two pressures were small. This interrelation mainly noticed in normal subjects.
Group II: The respiratory movement of intra-abdominal pressure was inverse in direction to that of intra-thoracic pressure, while the time lag and the magnitude difference between these pressures were large.
Group III: The respiratory movement of intra-abdominal pressure was double peaked in contour. The interrelation between the two pressures tended to be more similar in time lag & magnitude difference to Group IV than to Group II.
Group IV: The respiratory movement of intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures was in the same direction. The magnitude of the former was smaller than the latter and the time lag of the respiratory movement between these two pressures was small.
Ventilatory function, mechanics of breathing, pulmonary circulation, hepatic circulation and blood gases were compared among these four groups.
(a) Most of the patients of Group I had normal ventilatory function, while all patients of Group IV had moderate or severe combined ventilatory impairment (Fig. 8).
(b) These four groups had a close correlation with the viscous resistance and viscous work of the lung increased in order of the group number, i. e., these were the minimum in Group I and the maximum in Group IV (Fig. 12 and 13).
During voluntary hyperventilation and when the airway resistance is artificially increased, the patients of Group I, Group III tended to show the pattern of Group IV, as pulmonary viscous resistance had increased (Fig. 14 and 16).
Consequently, it is considered that the interrelations between intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures are mainly influenced by pulmonary viscous resistance, and that the pattern of respiratory movement of intra-abdominal pressure becomes similar to that of intra-thoracic pressure when pulmonary viscous resistance is significantly increased.
(c) The pulmonary arterial mean pressure was less than 15mmHg in all patients of Group I, while it was more than 15mmHg in all patients of Group III and Group IV (Fig. 18).
(d) The interrelations of the respiratory movement of the right atrial pressure and the wedged hepatic veinous pressure could also be classified into four groups, which were the same as the interrelations between the intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal pressures (Fig. 20).
(e) The arterial oxygen saturation was normal or slightly decreased in Group I, while all patients of Group III and IV had arterial hypoxemia (Fig. 22).
View full abstract