Purpose: On the basis of the results of a questionnaire survey of the participants of the Kyushu Pediatric Surgical Congress, we evaluated the usefulness of interval appendectomy for an appendix mass.
Methods: Comparative analyses were performed for the following procedures for patients aged 15 years and younger undergoing appendectomy: initial open appendectomy vs initial laparoscopic appendectomy, initial appendectomy with appendix mass vs initial appendectomy without appendix mass, and initial appendectomy with appendix mass vs interval appendectomy with appendix mass.
Results: Initial laparoscopic appendectomy, compared with initial open appendectomy, had a significantly longer operation time (94.0 ± 42.1 min vs 68.0 ± 31.8 min) and significantly reduced wound infection rates (0.8% vs 4.7%). Initial appendectomy with appendix mass, compared with initial appendectomy without appendix mass, had significantly longer operation time (122.6 ± 65.3 min vs 83.5 ± 38.8 min) and postoperative hospitalization (10.3 ± 7.2 days vs 5.7 ± 3.1 days), and more overall adverse postoperative events (21.4% vs 5.4%). Interval appendectomy with appendix mass, compared with initial appendectomy with appendix mass, had significantly fewer overall adverse postoperative events (0% vs 21.4%) and longer postoperative hospitalization (4.3 ± 1.9 days vs 10.3 ± 7.2 days). However, interval appendectomy with appendix mass, compared with initial appendectomy with appendix mass, had a significantly longer total hospitalization (19.0 ± 6.5 days vs 11.9 ± 8.4 days). No significant differences were observed in operation time and intraoperative complication between initial appendectomy with appendix mass and interval appendectomy with appendix mass.
Conclusion: The current results reaffirmed the difficulty of treatment of an appendix mass. Interval appendectomy had significant therapeutic usability for an appendix mass from the standpoint of adverse postoperative events and postoperative hospitalization. However, interval appendectomy was disadvantageous with regards to total hospitalization.
View full abstract