As the bone sustained implant directly, even a little error of the fitness between abutments and a superstructure will cause large stress around a prosthesis or the bone. Therefore, it might become the cause of breakage of a prosthesis or recession of bone. Fitness of a prosthesis depends largely on the accuracy of a working cast, and reproducible accuracy of an impression is needed as the most important factor for making it. It is difficult to place multiple implants parallel to each other. The angles formed where implants cross each other may affect reproducibility of an impression, and also, the difference of impression techniques may affect it. Three models, on which implants (CAMLOG
TM) were placed under three kinds of inclined angles (0°,10°,15°), were made impressions for making working cast. Reproducibility of the implant position on the working cast, which was made through five kinds of impression techniques, were compared,and results were as follows.
1. The parallel placed implants model was more accurate than the inclined placed implants model. And the displacement of the model with an inclination of 15 degrees was markedly larger than the one of 10 degrees.
2. In comparing impression techniques, a closed tray with a transfer cap was compared with one without a transfer cap, and the latter showed less displacement.
3. On an open tray impression technique, an impression with transfer coping was compared with one without it, and the latter showed more accuracy.
4. On the factor of closed tray impression technique with and without a transfer cap, the parallel placed implants model with a transfer cap showed more accuracy than the 10 or 15 degrees inclined placed implants model.
As described above, when multiple implants are placed, it is recommended that the angle formed by each implant be less than 10 degrees. And impression technique for the CAMLOG
TM implant, closed tray without a transfer cap is the most recommendable technique.
View full abstract