Bone augmentation has been used to restorer bone resorption in implant treatment. In general, bone grafts are used for bone augmentation. However, the bone newly formed by bone graft would cause bone resorption by remodeling. Similarly, bone resorption occurs in the sinus lift technique, but there is a difference of resorption volume depending on the type of graft bone. In this study, we investigated the volume of resorption after sinus lift using iliac bone. The subjects were 33 sinuses of 21 cases, and included two forms: the block and particular bone (block group), and particular bone only (particular group). The criterion for choosing the graft bone type was the alveolar bone height measured from dental CT images. In the case of under 5.0 mm, the combination of block and particular bone type was used, and only the particular bone type was used for other cases. The volume of bone resorption was measured by panorama CT images as vertical bone height at preoperative, 1 month after, and 6 months after, and the resorption ratio was calculated. The results were as follows.
1. The measured bone height at 1 month after in the block group was 21.1±3.3 (range of 16.4-25.4)mm, and in the particle group was 19.8±3.9 (range of 14.2-24.8) mm.
2. The measured bone height at 6 months after in the block group was 19.1±1.1 (range of 14.5-24.5) mm, and in the particle group was 14.0±2.6 (range of 10.4-16.4) mm.
3. The calculated value of bone resorption in the block group was 2.0±1.1 (range of 0.8-4.8)mm, and in the particle group was 5.8±1.9 (range of 3.6-8.4) mm.
4. The resorption ratio in the block group was 13.0±5.8 (range of 3.6-24.7)%, and in the particle group was 43.8±5.5 (range of 36.1-53.6)%.
5. In the block group, there was no significant difference in resorption ratio between genders.
6. In both groups, there was no significant difference in resorption ratio between presence and absence of perforation of the maxillary sinus membrane.
In the present results, the block group showed less bone resorption than the particle group considered from the variation of vertical bone height. Bone resorption was definitely prevented in the block group in comparison with the particle group. We consider that the bone block which was established upward of the sinus was useful for sinus lift because of less bone resorption.
View full abstract