A questionaire survey was carried out to asses the quality of life on 33 patients who had undergone urinary diversions. Urinary diversions were made by ileal conduit in 25 patients or by continent urinary reservoir(Kock or Mainz pouch)in 8.
Dermatitis around the stoma and fear of odour were the problem in patients who had ileal conduit,and difficulty of catheterization was the major problem in the patients given continent reservoir. With quality of life,the patients given continent reservoir were better in taking bath than ones having ileal conduit,however,sleeping was more compromised in the group with reservoir compared to the one with conduit. Subjective health appraisal was deteriorated in both groups of the patients. About half of the patients unsatisfied the life with urinary diversion in both groups,and almost all the patients were anxious about their life with urinary diversions. The results obtained here showed that urinary diversions did not always improve their quality of life.
View full abstract