Grinding is a unit of operation of a pure mechanical process. An attritor is a grinder able to be used for fine or selective grinding. However, few studies have reported on the optimum design for the attritor. The attritor’s grinding characteristics and grinding effect depend not only on the operating conditions, but also on the geometry of the
agitator
. Therefore, we investigated the effect of the
agitator
shape on the grinding efficiency from the viewpoint of experiments, kinetic analysis, and discrete element method (DEM) simulations. We conducted grinding experiments with two different agitators. One was
Agitator
A, a traditional design with two pairs of 90° staggered mixing arms at the middle and bottom of the mixing shaft. The other was
Agitator
B, with a lower mixing arm inclined by 10° along the horizontal direction. We found that the grinding rate constant of
Agitator
B was approximately 40% greater than that of
Agitator
A. Although the size distribution of the particles was relatively dispersed after grinding with
Agitator
B, the distribution was concentrated mainly within two ranges (<0.5 mm and 2–4 mm) with
Agitator
A. These results and an elemental analysis of each size fraction suggested that the dominating grinding mode in
Agitator
A was surface grinding, whereas in
Agitator
B, it was bulk grinding. In terms of the influence of the
agitator
shape, the DEM simulation results showed that the kinetic energy of the grinding media in
Agitator
B was 0.0046 J/s, i.e., larger than the 0.0035 J/s obtained for
Agitator
A. A collision energy analysis showed that the dominating collision was between the media and wall in the tangential direction for both models. The collision energy of the media in
Agitator
B was larger than that of that in
Agitator
A. The results from the DEM simulation can help us evaluate the experimental results and infer the reasons why the grinding rate constant in
Agitator
B is larger than that in
Agitator
A.
抄録全体を表示