In this paper, we discuss and investigate the relations between the goal and the curriculum of science education, especially those in the first and second graders at an elementary school, in the state of New South Wales (N.S.W.) in Australia. The analytical method of the goal of science education is the same as that in the previous paper. Concerning the lower graders of an elementary school, we analyse them from different points of view, such as phychology, pedagogy and philology, which are related with science. From the viewpoint of the three dimensional axes, we did analyse as in the previous paper. The new results are found as follows: 1. The goal of science education includes the three domains: cognitive, pedagogic and philologic domains. (1) cognitive domain: biological environment (living things around their houses), humanistic environment (use of tools and machines), and material environment (materials and energy) (2) sentimental domain: Emphasis is placed on the inquiry into the positive facts, the wide scope and the creative mind that should be acquired. (3) mental domain: It is emphatically important from the skill to increase by the employment of the five senses. In summary, the child's positive deeds are made much of, viewed from the points of attention, consideration and concern. 2. The contents of the science textbooks abound in the items of observation, exploration and organization, for the improvement in the scientific activities. The contents of the textbooks include the items of the system of measurement and the skill of easy experiments. The first graders begin to study the area of thinking. The sphere of the child's activities ranges from the environment around its house to its neighboring regions. The main objects of inquiring are biology and material domains, while the minor objects are humanity, the earth and cosmos. 3. Science textbooks contain a number of words, mainly related with nature and the child's activities. The words of social activities are few in number. Many words of the names concerning nature are easy to understand, but the words concerning the facts of social behavior are hard to understand. Generally speaking, it can be said that the words used in the textbooks are difficult to understand. 4. The model of the three dimensional structure could be adopted to analyse this case.
View full abstract