The United States performs twice as many hysterectomies per capita as England. Why?
This paper investigates how decisions made by gynecologists may influence on hysterectomy rates. If U. S. and English gynecologists differ substantially in their propensity to operate, then their decision making would contribute to the rate differences.
To expose judgment differences, we used hypothetical care vignettes based on the most commom indications for hysterectomy (e. g. endometriosis, uterine cancer). Economics, ethics, and other social factors were excluded. English and American physicians were presented with six identical cases and were asked two questions:“Would you operate on this patient?”and“If so, would you operate within on e month?”
Our r esults indicate that differences do exist between American and English gynecologists regarding the decision to operate. However, there is no clear trend. In vignette three, a case involving endometriosis and prolapse, U. S. respondents were significantly more likely to operate. In vignette four, a case involving cancer, English respondents opted for surgery much more often than American ones. In the other four vignettes, no significant difference surfaced.
At the same time, clinical judgement regard i ng the timing and urgency of hysterectomy was marked in all six cases. Once they elected to operate, American physicians were far more anxious to do so within one month than their English counterparts.
View full abstract