Various bite registration methods are used in general dental treatments. It is a crucial process to take out and reproduce centric relation records to the articulator without changing them from living bodies to diagnose and treat patients appropriately. The most important point is how reproducible the method is.
We experimented this time, to confirm the reproducibility of the gothic arch tracing method on the patients who have a dentulous ridge, since it is used for the general determination of the horizontal mandibular position. The five subjects are in their twenties through thirties, four females and one male. Two of the cases on the subjects are possibly suffering from temporomandibular disorder ; one case has already been treated for TMD ; one case has a type of open bite, and one case may have normal occlusion.
First, the cores were taken by the gothic arch tracing method on the apex and the tapping point, having the subjects bite lightly and heavily in each position. Also the records were taken by the improved chin-point method and the records after using and adjusting the occlusal splint for three weeks were taken by the same method. These cores and records were taken twice each.
Then the cores and records are confirmed with Denar's Centric Relator through the grooves of the split-cast. It must be determined whether or not the cores or records are identical, and whether the cores and records taken under the different circumstances and methods are identical as well. Besides, it was confirmed that the quantity and direction of the change of the position where the mandibular condyle was supposed to be, by using Denar's Vericheck Instrument.
The results are as follows : all 16 pairs by the gothic arch tracing method were not identical with each first and second core, except for one pair. But even that pair was not identical with any four records taken by the improved chin-point method. There was no definite correlation between any core's quantity and the direction of the change.
On the other hand, all of the centric relation records taken by the improved chin-point method were identical with each first and second record. That means each pair of records reproduced the same mandibular position. However, every record taken after using and adjusting the occlusal splint showed a different position from the initial records, in spite of the fact that they both were taken with the same method, except one subject who had been treated for temporomandibular disorder before. It can be thought that using and adjusting a splint makes masticatory muscles relax, and be able to get a more stable mandibular position. That means it is possible that the occlusal force occurs when the recording plate and stylus of the gothic arch tracer contact each other. Then those forces might have the mandibular condyle position change.
From the above, we can extract conclusions that in comparison with the improved chin-point method, the mandibular position taken by the gothic arch tracing method has a high chance of giving a different position from the stable mandibular condyle position, which raises questions on its reproducibility.
View full abstract