The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Online ISSN : 1881-8560
Print ISSN : 1881-3526
ISSN-L : 1881-3526
Volume 58, Issue 1
Displaying 1-19 of 19 articles from this issue
  • Hayato Ishitani
    2021Volume 58Issue 1 Pages 80-85
    Published: January 18, 2021
    Released on J-STAGE: March 15, 2021
    Advance online publication: October 22, 2020
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Objective:In athletes who are still in the growing period, lumbar spondylolysis is mainly treated with brace therapy to enable bone fusion. During the brace period, sports activities are often discontinued. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the combination of brace therapy and early physiotherapy affects the duration of return to play in athletes with lumbar spondylolysis.

    Methods:Thirty-seven athletes in the growing period with unilateral spondylolysis were included in the study. They were classified into two groups:17 patients who rested during the brace period(brace group)and 20 patients who combined the brace with early physical therapy (combination group). The examined items were duration of the brace period and duration from the end of the brace therapy to return to play (return period). Both these items were compared between the brace group and the combination group. In addition, the union rate of both groups was also calculated.

    Results:The return period was significantly shorter in the combination group than in the brace group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to other data.

    Conclusion:Since there was no significant difference in the duration of the brace period and the union rate between both groups, we believe that early physical therapy intervention does not adversely affect bone union in athletes with spondylolysis who are in the growing period. Therefore, it is considered that the combined use of brace therapy and early physical therapy can maintain flexibility and muscular strength during the brace period and can enable a smooth transit to playing after the bone union is complete.

    Download PDF (2163K)
  • Shuntaro Kawaguchi, Sumiko Yamamoto
    2021Volume 58Issue 1 Pages 86-94
    Published: January 18, 2021
    Released on J-STAGE: March 15, 2021
    Advance online publication: October 22, 2020
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Objective:The knee joint in patients using a knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) is locked, and the lack of knee flexion can cause some problems in the gait, such as circumduction and excessive pelvic obliquity. Hence, a KAFO with knee flexion control was developed. This study aimed to compare the gait in stroke patients using KAFOs with a locked knee joint and a controlled knee joint.

    Methods:A newly developed electro-attractive-material (EAM) was used for the knee joint in the KAFO. The knee joint is locked in the stance phase, and released immediately after the manual switch is pushed by a physical therapist.

    The gait of seven stroke patients in the recovery phase was measured for KAFO with a locked knee joint (locked knee) and a controlled knee joint (EAM knee) . For gait measurement, an inertial sensor, a foot switch, and an EMG sensor were used.

    Results:The velocity increased and the swing time decreased in the EAM-knee as compared to the locked knee. The abduction, external rotation, and extension of the hip joint decreased in the EAM knee. Increased activity of the rectus femoris muscle in the loading response, and decreased activity of the longissimus doris in the swing phase were observed in the EAM knee.

    Conclusions:It was suggested that EAM KAFO could improve the gait parameter and reduce the movement on the paretic side by compensatory motions in the swing phase, thereby reducing the muscle activity of the longissimus doris muscle.

    Download PDF (2410K)
feedback
Top