Recently, NPWT has played an important role in wound healing, and several studies revealed its effectiveness in split-thickness skin grafting. In Japan, the effectiveness of split-thickness skin graft using NPWT has not been compared with that of standard bolster dressing; therefore, the aim of this study was to assess and compare its effectiveness for split-thickness skin grafting retrospectively.
Between June 2010 and August 2016, 113 inpatients of Kanazawa Medical University whose wound required skin grafting after wound bed preparation using NPWT were recruited. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Skin grafts were dressed by NPWT in group I, and dressed by the standard method in group II. We reviewed and compared the subjects.
Regarding the graft take rate, group II (96.6% take rate)had a significantly better rate than group I (81.8% take rate)(p < 0.05). There was no difference between the 2 groups in days until the first dressing change(p < 0.05). Although NPWT is effective for graft dressing, standard dressings resulted in a significantly better graft take rate. This may be due to excess exudate fluid.
View full abstract