There are many approaches to understanding how a music style is characterized. This paper is an attempt to understand a characteristic of
gamelan not through actual performing methods or the real situation of completed music making, but by way of observing processes of learning the playing techniques. A completed performance, without exception, is based on certain learning processes before it.
As a typical form, I focus on
gamelan in central Java to be the subject and analyze the processes of learning.
Gamelan is still one of the most popular genres of music in Java and one can often appreciate it through the mass media such as radio and television. In addition,
gamelan is taught in the music classes in schools of compulsory education. In Jave,
gamelan is often used with formalities as in marriage or circumcision ceremonies. In the villages
gamelan instruments found in assembly halls are used for practicing as well as for the village events. In fact,
gamelan is enjoyed in various phases of Javanese life. How then is
gamelan actually learned by the people?
My comparative study of the processes of learning is based on differentiating four patterns as follows:
1) the learning process by Japanese in Japan
2) the learning process by Indonesians in general school education
3) the learning process by Javanese in high school or universities specializing in traditional music
4) the learning process by groups functioning independently in the villages
These types show differences in the performing skills of the respective students. For example, Javanese
gamelan performers generally comes in touch with
gamelan as a kind of leisure play at first. At that time they may sometimes begin to study
gamelan for more interests. Many performers begin to study
gamelan in elementary schools or junior high schools, and continue learning it by taking part in a group of villages, too. After that they are admitted to the high school or the university specializing in traditional music through entrance examinations. They then may perform
gamelan as a performer or an educator.
The learning method used by Japanese in Japan is a well-considered, anclytical one, tanght by teachers who have observea and grasped complete performances from outside. Students memorize fixed melodies and then learn to play other instruments. The more they learn, the more difficult instruments they may play. At a final point, they may have the ability to play all the instruments of the gamelan. By this method students can acquire the skills relatively quickly, but only mechanically.
The learning methods in general school lessons and extracurricular activities are also analytically organized. The teachers teach the students how to pay respect to instruments as well as to sing melodies and verses. These elments are not found in Japanese methods but the metheds used in Javanese in schools are similar to the Japanese ones at in that they start the paper with the easier instruments, and them proceed to more difficult instruments.
The learning methods in high schools and universities specializing in traditional music are primarily based on copying teachers' models. The teachers do not explain much about performances and do nothing but play instruments over and over again. Students acquire other knowledge such as the history of
gamelan.
I was at first under the impression that the ways of study in villages are irrational. The teachers let students freely choose an instrument. But the students have already played instruments at festivals and can play a little. At that time they cannot always play pieces and instruments suited to their playing level. They copy other players' performances.
抄録全体を表示