Currently, the use of the internet is rapidly increasing, and thus, patients and their families have greater access to information on diseases and their cure. However, the credibility of such information has not been examined. This study aimed to examine the credibility of the websites that contained information on acute pain after abdominal operations.
Of 75 websites that contained information about postoperative pain following laparotomy, four main topics (disclosure of basic information, contents, communication, and privacy) of the e-Health Code of Ethics 2.0 were evaluated on a scale of one to three, and results were analyzed using simple tabulation for each website; websites were classified as follows: general websites, personal websites, blogs, and bulletin boards.
Although most bulletin boards disclosed basic information, the other types of websites did not do this adequately. Less than 50% of all types of websites disclosed basic information about contents and communication providers. In total, 45% of general websites ensured the objectivity, accuracy, and validity of the standard of medical information provided on the website, but only a few of the other types of websites ensured this. The acquirer and administrator for personal information was included in 50% or more of general websites and blogs but only in less than 10% of bulletin boards.
View full abstract