In continuing the previous studies (This Journal, 1934,
42, 273, 628, 688; 1935,
43, 215, 572; 1936,
44, 22, etc.), the authors report the results of further studies on high siliceous mixed Portland cements. The principal points of the present report were abstracted from the original Japanese paper, as following:
(1) Many samples of siliceous admixtures were analysed by both methods of ordinary total analysis and special soluble analysis. The latter method is the treatment of sample with 10% NaOH solution and then with 5% HCl solution to separate soluble components, and its result of amount of soluble parts, especially soluble silica, is the most important point to discuss the suitableness of the admixture. The results are shown in the following table 1.
Table 1-Results of Soluble Analysis of Various Siliceous Admixtures
From these results it is seen that the siliceous admixtures of highest grade containing large amount of soluble silica and medium grade can be used for the mixed Portland cement, but the admixtures of low and lowest grades containing small amount of soluble silica can not be used with good result. For the comparison two samples of blast furnace slag after water granulation were analysed, which were nearly completely soluble and different from siliceous admixtures by containing large amount of lime.
Table 2-Results of Comparative Tests of Physical Properties and Chemical Compositions of Various Samples of Common and Mixed Portland Cements
(2) Many series of samples of mixed Portland cements were prepared from these admixtures and cement or its clinker in the proportion of 30-45 parts of admixture and 70-55 parts of cement or clinker, by grinding with small amount of gypsum in a small test ball mill. These samples were systematically compared on their physical properties and chemical compositions to discuss the suitableness of admixtures above classified. Some results of these tests are shown in the above table 2.
It is seen from these results, that (1) All mixed Portland cements have smaller specific gravities and slower setting times than common Portland cements, (2) Chemical compositions of mixed Portland cements differ quitely from common Portland cements, especially large amounts of silica and insoluble residue and small amount of lime, (3) Blast furnace slag cements differ from other kinds of siliceous mixed Portland cements, in the smaller amounts of silica and insoluble residue, larger amount of alumina and lime, and some amounts of sulphide, sulphur and manganese oxide, etc., (4) Two samples of alumina cement imported are quitely different from these common and mixed Portland cement, in their large content of alumina, (5) Some samples of mixed Portland cements, i.e., No. 299, No. 300, No. 310, No. 427 and No. 429, are special mixed Portland cements obtained by mixing and grinding clinker or cement with admixture and slaked lime or calcined (about at 900°C for 2 hours) mixture of admixture and limestone, and these special mixed Portland cements have quick setting time as that of common Portland cement, owing to the content of some amount of free lime added.
(3) These cement samples were tested on their mortar strengths by both methods of (a) dry or non-plastic mortar of Japanese Engineering Standards for Portland cement (JES 28) and blast furnace slag cement (JES 29) and (b) wet or plastic mortar newly prposed by Prof. R_??_s in Switzerland and by Dr. Haegermann in Germany. High siliceous mixed Portland cements, i.e., No. 282, No. 298, No. 299, etc., have remarkably high strengths by the nonplastic mortar, which are greater than those of alumina cements, early high strength Portland cements, etc., but their strengths by plastic mortars are smaller than those of common Portland cement.
(4) These cement samples were tested their expansions or contractions and corrosions of prismatic test pieces (4×4×16cm) of plastic mortar during the curing in
View full abstract