International Journal of Curriculum Development and Practice
Online ISSN : 2424-1415
Print ISSN : 1344-4808
ISSN-L : 1344-4808
Volume 22, Issue 1
Displaying 1-2 of 2 articles from this issue
  • Current Situation of the Transplanted Curriculum
    Satoshi KUSAKA
    2020 Volume 22 Issue 1 Pages 1-13
    Published: 2020
    Released on J-STAGE: July 11, 2021
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Reviewing curriculum according to the local needs and circumstances is a key issue to be addressed for the improvement of quality education in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This problem has been discussed in the field of mathematics education for over 30 years such as the uniform mathematics curriculum does not work since it does not fully reflect their own needs. This study considers the issue of post-independence measures by formerly subordinated countries in order to address curriculum transplantation from colonial powers through a comparative analysis of the current mathematics intended curriculum of Mozambique and Portugal. The analysis found significant differences between two countries, including the school systems, mathematics education objectives and curriculum formation. One of the reasons for the difference is that Mozambique reduced the amount of learning content in lower grades in the latest curriculum revision. The findings give implications for policy and practice that could be benefit to other countries which face similar challenges.
    Download PDF (143K)
  • Kohei Nishizuka
    2020 Volume 22 Issue 1 Pages 15-47
    Published: 2020
    Released on J-STAGE: July 11, 2021
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    A central concern for educational researchers and practitioners regarding formative assessment in Japan is its practice within less predictable educational settings. The scattered research findings on the subject have not allowed for policy formulation and analysis of specific trends from an international perspective. This research builds on Bennett’s critical discussion and aims to create a descriptive review of prior research findings in Japan. Following Bennett’s expanded 15 viewpoints, the present qualitative analysis revealed the following three findings: (1) self-questioning perspectives should be applied to the relevant theories; (2) a consideration of the interconnection between classrooms, schools, and policies to develop assessment systems, including the relation of assessment for formative and summative purposes, is required; and (3) it is necessary to acquire additional sociocultural contexts to sensitively debate student agencies, evaluate formative assessments within a shared community of practice, and contribute to its practical application.
    Download PDF (223K)
feedback
Top