Objectives: Symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) can be atypical, and some patients with AMI do not use an ambulance to travel to the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of patients with AMI who do not arrive by ambulance (i.e., walk-in patients).
Methods: A retrospective study was performed for all ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who presented to the ED from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2012 in an urban ED in Japan. We compared baseline characteristics and the initial management of patients who arrived by ambulance with those of walk-in patients. We also compared the severity and prognosis of AMI.
Results: Data were collected from 362 patients. Of these, 95 (26.2%) arrived as walk-in patients and 267 (73.8%) arrived by ambulance. There was no significant difference in age and sex ratio between the groups. The onset-to-door time of the walk-in group was significantly longer than that of the ambulance group (median, 3 hours [IQR: 1-10]) vs. 2 hours [IQR: 1-4]), respectively, p<0.0001). Significantly fewer walk-in patients had chest symptoms (64.2% vs. 77.9%, respectively, p=0.01), but the proportion of patients with diabetes did not significantly differ between groups. The door-to-ECG time for the walk-in group was significantly longer (median, 10 minutes [IQR, 7-16] vs. 6 minutes [IQR: 3-8], respectively [p<0.0001]). The door-to-balloon time of the walk-in group was also significantly longer (median, 129 minutes [IQR: 99-160] vs. 104 minutes [IQR: 78-135], respectively [p<0.0001]). Peak CK and the proportions of patients with Killip IV class AMI, ventricular assist devices, and complications were not significantly different in the 2 groups. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for walk-in patients (median, 15 days [IQR: 12-22] vs. 17 days [IQR: 14-23], respectively, [p=0.03]). However, the length of ICU stay and the rates of inhospital death were not significantly different between the groups.
Conclusion: Walk-in AMI patients had longer onset-to-door time and were more likely to have chest symptoms than such patients who arrived by ambulance. The door-to-ECG time and the door-to-balloon time were also longer for walk-in patients. It is necessary to educate patients without chest symptoms to visit to the ED sooner, and construct more effective hospital triage procedures to properly screen for AMI in patients who present to the ED without using an ambulance.
View full abstract