Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi(JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
Online ISSN : 2187-8986
Print ISSN : 0546-1766
ISSN-L : 0546-1766
Volume 66, Issue 9
Displaying 1-5 of 5 articles from this issue
Special article
Original article
  • Yu NOFUJI, Satoshi SEINO, Hiroshi MURAYAMA, Yuka YOSHIDA, Tomomi TANIG ...
    2019 Volume 66 Issue 9 Pages 560-573
    Published: September 15, 2019
    Released on J-STAGE: October 04, 2019
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Objectives Preventing frailty is a crucial issue in aging societies such as Japan. In 2011, we launched an action research project in Yabu City, Hyogo Prefecture, to develop effective community-based strategies to prevent frailty in the elderly. We attempted to introduce community-based frailty prevention classes in every administrative district with the help of the senior workforce at Silver Human Resources Centers. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and the applicability to different communities of this strategy, which will be called the “Yabu model.”

    Methods Using PAIREM (Plan, Adoption, Implementation, Reach, Effectiveness, Maintenance) framework, we evaluated the effectiveness and the applicability to different communities of the Yabu model. To evaluate its effectiveness, we conducted a baseline and follow-up survey of residents aged 65 years or older in 2012 (n=7,287, 90.7% response rate) and 2017 (n=8,157, 85.7%), using a mailed self-administered questionnaire.

    Results (1) Plan: The idea was to establish a frailty prevention class (60 min/session, once a week) consisting of resistance exercises and nutritional or psychosocial programs (standard course, six months, 20 sessions/course; short course, one and a half months, 6 sessions/course; after the course, residents continued with the activities themselves). We planned to launch three classes in the first year (2014) and then to increase the number of classes by ten each year after the second year. (2) Adoption: Out of 154 administrative districts, 36 (23.4%) held frailty prevention classes between 2014 and 2017. (3) Implementation: The median attendance rate for the standard or short course (number of times each participant attended/number of frailty prevention class sessions held) was 75.0%. (4) Reach: A total of 719 older people participated in the standard or short course. The participation rate in the administrative districts, where each frailty prevention class was held, was 32.8%, while at the city level it was 8.1%. (5) Effectiveness: Propensity score matching after multiple imputations were performed. While the prevalence of frailty in non-participants increased by 13.7% in the five years from 2012 to 2017, it only increased by 6.8% in participants. Compared to non-participants, program participants had a significantly lower prevalence odds ratio of frailty at the time of the follow-up survey (OR=0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.93). (6) Maintenance: After the standard or short course, 25 out of 26 communities (96.2%) continued the frailty prevention activities once a week.

    Conclusion The frailty prevention classes were adopted across many districts and lowered the participants’ risk of frailty. Moreover, participants continued to engage in frailty prevention activities even after the course. These results indicate the Yabu model's effectiveness and its applicability for a different community.

    Download PDF (783K)
  • Kaori KODAMA, Toshihiro ITO
    2019 Volume 66 Issue 9 Pages 574-581
    Published: September 15, 2019
    Released on J-STAGE: October 04, 2019
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Objective This study aimed (1) to clarify sick leave-related factors in Japanese working cancer patients receiving outpatient treatment and (2) to assess quality of life (QOL) in this group of patients.

    Methods A survey was conducted using a questionnaire designed for adult cancer patients aged 20 to 64 years who were currently receiving outpatient treatment and living in Hokkaido. The questionnaire was used to collect data on basic characteristics, cancer-related factors, and QOL (SF-12v2, Japanese edition). To clarify the factors related to sick leave, we first calculated the propensity score using logistic regression analysis. The presence or absence of sick leave was the dependent variable, and the basic attributes were the covariates. We then analyzed each variable with significant differences in basic and cancer-related attributes as an independent variable using binomial logistic regression analysis. Quality of life was evaluated by comparing scores on the eight subscales and three component summaries of the SF-12v2.

    Results There were a total of 147 respondents, of which 79 were included in this study. They were classified into two groups: the leave group (29, 36.7%) and the work continuation group (50, 63.3%). The logistic regression analysis with propensity score adjustment showed that taking leave were associated with patients who were less than 6 months since cancer diagnosis (odds ratio=17.9, P<0.001) and patients who had not undergone surgery (odds ratio=3.9, P=0.011). The QOL scores of the leave group were lower than those of the Japanese national sample in seven out of the eight subscales, and there was a significant decrease in the six items for the work continuation group. In particular, two role functioning dimensions—physical and emotional—were remarkably decreased. In the analysis of component summary scores, it was found that QOL scores of cancer patients were lower for the role component summary (RCS) and physical component summary (PCS) compared with the national samples; however, mental component summary scores showed an increasing trend. The leave group had significantly lower RCS and PCS scores compared with the work continuation group.

    Conclusion We surveyed Japanese working cancer patients and analyzed sick leave-related factors and QOL in that population. We found that having less than 6 months since cancer diagnosis and not having undergone surgery were highly related to leave, and QOL scores (RCS and PCS) were low. The results of this study indicate that Japanese working cancer patients need to be provided with support that is based on their specific characteristics.

    Download PDF (413K)
Public health report
  • Atsuko TAGUCHI, Mayu BIZEN, Atsushi MATSUNAGA, Eri MORISHITA, Junko IW ...
    2019 Volume 66 Issue 9 Pages 582-592
    Published: September 15, 2019
    Released on J-STAGE: October 04, 2019
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Objective Many preventive care supporter (e.g. kaigo-yobo supporter) training programs, conducted to train community residents, are developed by municipalities. However, it is not necessary that only municipalities can train people effectively or efficiently. In this paper, we initially reviewed the relevant literature and clarified the definitions of concepts like “program contents” and “evaluation indicators,” while also planning our own training programs. Later, we developed a program based on the review and examined the results.

    Methods The literature of the training program was examined, and the training program was developed based on the result. Four researchers and three public health nurses from a community general support center, in the Otsuchi Town of Iwate Prefecture, developed a training program from June to September 2017. The training program developed was then conducted from October to November 2017. To evaluate the participants’ satisfaction with the program, a self-report survey was conducted. To evaluate the outcomes of the program, we measured their degree of comprehension of their community's challenges, before and after the program.

    Results The training program was divided into two parts following the literature review. In the first part, the content of the supporters’ activities following the program was determined (Type A), and, in the second, the same content was evaluated by the participants within the program (Type B). Type A consisted of various aspects including both concrete knowledge and skills needed to conduct care preventiveactivities after the program. In Type B, there were many aspects—including both lectures and exercises—that aimed to increase the participants’ awareness of community challenges, as well as inspection to learn about pioneering activities which helped them consider concrete care preventive activities following the program. In Otsuchi Town, we found it to be imperative for participants to consider how to respond to various situations and accordingly plan the training program for use in Type B. To evaluate the results, 12 participants were analyzed. Participants included two men and ten women, with an average age of 71.4±10.0 years [range: 53-88]. Comprehension levels of community challenges (3.1→4.1, P=0.046), as well as the confidence to actively involve themselves in their own preventive care strategies (3.4→4.0, P=0.035), significantly increased after involvement in the program. However, their confidence to work for community preventive care support groups (3.1→3.5, P=0.227) did not increase significantly.

    Conclusion We clarified certain viewpoints, such as the purpose, content, and evaluation indices of community care training programs, by reviewing the relevant literature. Based on the discovered viewpoints, we were then able to obtain certain results through implementing our own training programs, thereby significantly increasing participant comprehension and confidence levels.

    Download PDF (465K)
Information
feedback
Top