Objectives　Monitoring of obesity and underweight prevalence in general populations is crucial for the implementation of effective public health measures. Self-reported height and weight values are often used to assess the body mass index (BMI) in such epidemiological surveillance. However, it is known that using self-reported height and weight may underestimate the prevalence of obesity (BMI≥25 kg/m²), while its accuracy for underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m²) prevalence is not well-understood. The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review on the accuracy of self-reported anthropometrics in the Japanese population, where both obesity and underweight are prevalent.

Methods　Using PubMed and CiNii Research, a literature search was conducted for studies published in English or Japanese by 2022 that were conducted in Japan and compared self-reported and measured height, weight, or/and BMI. The study design and mean reported errors (mean of reported values－mean of measured values) were extracted and tabulated, and differences by BMI categories were also considered.

Results　A total of 17 studies, with 11 being published in English, were included in this review. These studies were conducted in nationwide cohort studies (n=4), local populations (n=4), workplaces (n=3), and educational institutions (n=6), with diverse age ranges (10–91 years) and sample sizes (<100 to >30,000). Although the degree of mean reporting error varied between studies, most of the studies reported that height was overreported, weight was underreported, and BMI was underestimated. In the three studies that reported mean reporting errors by BMI category, the direction of reporting error for height remained consistent across all body size categories, while weight and BMI were overreported and overestimated only among the underweight. Four studies in adults showed that 14.2–37.6% of actually obese individuals and 11.1–32.3% of underweight individuals were misclassified as ‘normal range’ (18.5≤BMI<25 kg/m²) based on self-reporting, while 0.8–5.4% and 1.2–4.1% of individuals actually within the normal range were misclassified as ‘underweight’ and ‘obese’ based on self-report, respectively.

Conclusion　This study suggests that using BMI based on self-reported height and weight can underestimate the prevalence of both obesity and underweight in the Japanese population. These biases should be taken into consideration when using self-reported anthropometrics in epidemiological studies.

Objectives　This study was aimed at clarifying characteristics of ethical dilemmas and behaviors in the support process of older adults and their families among nurses at community general support centers.

Methods　A self-administered questionnaire survey was mailed to 449 nurses at community general support centers in Tokyo. Question items enquired their age, employment license, years of experience as a nurse, the presence of ethics-related organizations, number of cases in which nurses faced difficulties in supporting older adults and their families in decision making over the past year, the ethical dilemmas they experienced and their situations, and ethical behavior in the process of supporting older adults and their families.

Results　From the 143 responses (response rate: 31.8%), 135 (valid response rate: 30.1%) nurses were analyzed. Overall, 43.0% and 27.4% of the participants were in their 50s and 40s, respectively. Of these, 77.0% and 23.0% were nurses and public health nurses, respectively. In total, 52 (38.5%) respondents had an ethics-related organization. The average number of cases in which the respondents faced difficulties in supporting older adults and their families in decision making over the past year was 8.3 (standard deviation, 12.5). Of these, the average number of cases in which they faced difficulties in making ethical decisions was 4.1 (standard deviation, 6.0). Regarding the perception of ethical dilemmas, 113 (83.7%) answered “often” or “sometimes.” Ethical dilemma situations included “the intentions of the user and family were different, and I had trouble deciding what to respect” 95 (84.1%); “the user's intention was different from my judgment as a professional, and I had trouble deciding what to respect” 64 (56.6%); and “the intention of the user and neighbors were different, and I had trouble deciding what to respect” 56 (49.6%). Ethical behaviors included “I observe the management rules in my organization regarding personal information data” 116 (85.9%); “I provide easy-to-understand explanations appropriate to the user's situation” 115 (85.2%); and “I decide on a support policy with several staff members when self-decision making is difficult due to the user's situation” 113 (83.7%).

Conclusion　More than 80% of the nurses perceived ethical dilemmas. Characteristics of the situations were that users and their families, users and professionals, and users and their neighbors had different intentions. Further research should be conducted on ethical issues related to community-based integrated care.