In the oral care of the elderly by themselves various devices, including the toothbrush, have been utilized but with difficulty due to reduced physical and mental functions. Among these devices, a cotton applicator (Mentip
® Large and small) used widely in Japan, and a shanked sponge (Toothette
®) used widely in Western countries, were examined and evaluated as to their effects of cleaning the oral mucosa and tooth surface. An upper jaw cast (oral model) or a human oral cavity (palate mucosa and upper and lower front teeth surface), to which adhesive materials were attached, was swabbed with a cotton applicator or shanked sponge, and the volume of swabbed materials was measured macroscopically for the oral model and through image processing for the human oral cavity.
In experiments with the oral model using the large and small cotton applicators and the shanked sponge, the following results were obtained:
1) The cleaning effect of the small cotton applicator was extremely poor.
2) A good cleaning effect could be obtained with the large cotton applicator when adhesive materials were rubbed for more than 15 seconds.
3) The cleaning effect of shanked sponge was good in all of the cleanig procedures examined.
In interoral experiments performend using the large cotton applicator and shanked sponge, the following results were obtained:
1) The cleaning effect on the palate was significantly better with the shanked sponge, compared with the large cotton applicator, in all of cleaning procedures examined.
The removal rate of adhesive materials with the shanked sponge was more than 99%.
2) Although no difference in cleaning effect on the teeth surfaces between cotton applicator and shanked sponge was observed when each device was used without rotation after it was soaked in water and slightly wrung, the shanked sponge showed singificantly better cleaning effects in all other cleaning procedures. The removal rate of adhesive materials with the shanked sponge under the most satisfactory conditions was 98%, and with the cotton applicator, was 81%.
View full abstract