Photographic effects were experimented on follows:
As general M. Q. developers,
(A) Universal Tri-Chemi Pack (Kodak), (B) Flo Film (Du Pont) As fine grain developers,
(C) Final (Agfa), (D) Atomal (Agfa), (E) Edwal 20 (Edwal Labo.), (F) Minicol (Edwal Labo.), (G) Ansco 17 (Ansco), (H) Microdol (Eastman Kodak)
As developers increacing film speed,
(I) Hydam-additions (Chicago Photo Products), (J) Von-L Gold-XX (Mon Blanc Chem. Co.), (K) Von-L Gold-XX U. S.(Mon Blanc Chem. Co.), (L) Ethol 90 (Associated Agency Corp.)
As fixers,
(M) Universal Tri-Pack Fixer (Kodak), (N) Fixer-Hardner (Ansco), (O) Flo Film Fixer (DuPont), (P) Fixer-one powder (Kodak)
Effects on the characteristic curves, the failure of reciprocity law and graininess of developed image were experimented with referring to D-72, XD-20, Ansco 17M, Fuji FD-122, DK-20 and Fuji “Microfine”. On photographic fixers, some properties required to those were examined.
Noticeable developers were “Microdol” at the point of fine graininess, “Atomal” at linear gradation, Fuji test “FD-S1” at increacing film speed with optimum gradation. Developers of “Final”, “Edwal 20”, “Minicol” and “Ansco 17” were not so fine grains as “Microdol”, “Microfine” or DK-20. “Ethol 90”, “Hydram” and “Von-L Gold-XX” gave extremely hardness tone.
Although Kodak powder fixer was best quality, it was precipitated in water above 30°C as all other mixed powder fixers that were tested.
View full abstract