The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of grain size of corn as one of the principal materials in current years for formula feed upon its digestibility in pigs. Corn grains were ground by a mill equipped with screens with varying mesh sizes of 1mm, 2mm, 3mm, and 5mm, respectively, in the grinding instrument. The corn grains thus ground were added in a ratio of 40% each to the formula feed used for performance test on meat production in Japan in the experimental groups, and the mixed feeds were used as the test feed samples. Five Landrace barrows weighing 32 to 38kg at the beginning of the experiment were each placed in metabolism cages, and the test on digestion was conducted for a preliminary period of 5 days and a feces collection period for 5 days subsequent to it so as to estimate the digestibility of each experimental feed of 5 different kinds as a 5×5 Latin square. The 5 kinds of test feed comprised the group of only the formula feed and 4 other groups of 4 different kinds of formula feeds. These were given to pigs in an amount of 40g per kg of body weight per day, divided equally to each animal and given at about 9a.m. and 3p.m. Sufficient amount of water was also provided to them throughout the experiment. The results were as summarized below.
The average digestibility of each component of the ground corn by mesh size of screen of 1mm, 2mm, 3mm and 5mm was 90.3, 89.3, 88.8 and 87.6% of dry matter, 91.2, 90.1, 89.6 and 88.4% of organic substances, 82.1, 74.9, 73.8 and 70.6% of crude protein, 84.3, 80.5, 74.6 and 66.9% of ether extract, 94.1, 93.9, 93.0 and 92.7% of nitrogen-free extract, 19.5, 22.0, 27.6 and 26.4% of crude fiber, 89.8, 88.2, 87.5 and 85.9% of gross energy and 100.0, 99.9, 99.7 and 99.6% of starch, respectively.
It is suggested therefore that the digestibility of each component of ground corn except the crude fiber tended to be better as the grain size of the corn became smaller.
The digestibility of each component of the corn except that of crude fiber through the treatment with 1mm screen was significantly (p<0.05) higher than that with 5mm screen treatment.
The average nutritive value of the corn by treatment with 1mm, 2mm, 3mm and 5mm screen was 7.7, 7.0, 6.9 and 6.7% in DCP, 4.05, 4.05, 3.94 and 3.93kcal/g in DE and 94.3, 93.1, 92.1 and 90.4% in TDN, respectively. Any of these nutritive values of the material with 1mm screen was significantly higher (P<0.05) than the counterparts of the material with 5mm screen treatment. Both DCP and TDN of the 1mm screen treatment were also significantly higher (P<0.05) than those in 3mm screen treatment.
Therefore, the above-mentioned data can be claimed to be clearly showing that the grain size of the diet is one of the important factors in comparatively evaluating the digestibility and nutritive values of feedstuff with high accuracy because the grain size exerts significant influences upon the digestibility of feed.
View full abstract