This paper aims to clarify the women‘s participation structure of labour market in Thailand. The sources to analyse obtain from Population and Housing Census, Report of the Labor Force Survey, and the sampling survey in Bangkok and Udonthani. The findings of this analysis are as follows. 1) M-type employed structure by age group or cohort is not found according to any categories, for example as a whole, time series, occupational categories and municipal/non-municipal areas. In Thailand, there is the house wives’ norm that women must be staying at home, but the age cohort of childbirth centers around teenage or the first half of twenties. And the additional factor is the higher level of participation in miners than that in developed countries. 2) In women's cases of Thailand, the blue collar category was increasing, but from 1980’s to 1990’s this category has declined in twenties age cohort. In contrast, sales, services, and white collar workers were increasing as usually. The rapid economic growth demanded for the women's white collar workers more than men's. 3) In Thailand, there are also many islamic communities as other Asian countries. The norm of islamic community that women cannot participate the labour market outside of the household effects the ratio of economic activity of islamic women. But in Thailand, the effect is not strong in contrast with islamic countries. 4) At the income per month of white collar workers, these differentials between men and women have reduced in recent years. It would be said that women's social status is evaluated with their educational careers as achieved status. But excluding professionals, the occupied ratio of managerial women's workers is low as about 30% which compared with men's workers as 100%. And clerical workers still have a large gap concerning their salaries by gender.
抄録全体を表示