This paper reports weight growth of
Chrysanthemum coronarium in hydroponic culture under various conditions, measured by continuous and nondestructive weighing systems using load plate as already had been reported.
After 12 day's growth of seeds in constant environment, average weight of 25 seedlings was about 1g. These seedlings were transplanted at intervals of 4 cm in lattice way on the load plate, and cultivated for 18 days in growth chamber under various combinations of temperature, light and nutrient conditions. Light conditions were realized by two 400 W metal halide lamps and four 300 W herogen lamps in use of taking color photograph. Illuminance were controlled by the number of lamps or regulating supply voltage to herogen lamps. Nutrient conditions of hydroponic water were supplied by changing weights of fine grained fertilizer (Hyponex) dissolved in every 10 liters were used in tests. Half of them were in the culture tank and the other in the reservoir tank. They were circulated periodically at every two hours to make their temperature uniform and to supply the air dissolved in them. 10 liters of them were exchanged and supplied by new ones every other day. Temperature of hydroponic water was not controlled, but it was about two or three degrees lower than setting temperatures of growth chamber.
1. After setting various prescribed conditions, tests were carried out and the results as shown in Table 1 were obtained. Maximum fresh yield grew out in the conditions, 25°C, 16 klux, 15 g/10 liters and the mean weights of individual plants was 13.6 g. This value was calculated as 8, 510 kg in terms of yield per 10 are, and it was equivalent to about 3.5 times of average yield harvested in usual farming under structure.
2. Applying weight growth data measured at interval of six hours to exponential growth Eq. (1), it can be considered to be appropriate as regression curve within 50 g that was the total weight of 25 test plants, because the mean value of standard deviation from the regression curve was 2.29 g and this was equivalent to about 4.5% of 50 g.
3. Applying the same data to Robertson's growth Eq. (3), it can not be considered to appropriate as regression curve because the deviation were over from the measured data in logarithmic growth period and existence of upper growth limit was not confirmed in any tests.
4. Growth ratio of plants became small by changing illuminance weaker on the half way of cultivation test. Its degrees of reduction was smaller than that of cultivation test under lighting weaker constantly through all the process
5. Yield, obtained by cultivating under lighting for a given period of hours in every day, can be nearly considered as the value that multiplied the yield gained under lighting continuously for 24 hr by the square of ratio of total hours in lighting intermittently to in lighting continuously.
View full abstract