Functional imaging of the brain provides information on the functional activation during motor tasks. The physiological roles of the frontomesial cortex during various unimanual motions have been investigated using the technique. It has been reported that frontomesial cortex contains at least four distinct areas: pre-SMA (supplementary motor area); SMA-proper; RCZ (rostral cingulate zone); CCZ (caudal cingulate zone). However, the activations of these areas during bimanually coordinated motions have not been fully investigated by the functional imaging studies. In the present study we analyzed the influence of bimanual coordination on activations of these four areas using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The subjects were 7 healthy right-handed volunteers, aged 22 to 42 (mean 30) years. They performed 2 bimanual motor tasks requiring the repetitive closing and opening of both fists: simultaneous agonistic movement of both hands (task A); simultaneous antagonistic movement of both hands (task B). In task A, the subjects simultaneously made fists with both hands and then simultaneously opened them, whereas in task B they made a fist with one hand while simultaneously opening the contralateral fist, and then the reverse. The only difference between tasks A and B was the timing of the closing and opening of the contralateral fists. Each task consisted of alternating periods of 20 seconds of rest (resting period) and 20 seconds of motor execution (activation period). The movements were performed in accordance with the sound of the MR machine. The functional images of bilateral sagital slices were obtained by gradient-echo and echo-planar sequences. We counted and compared the total number of activated pixels between the tasks. SMA proper was activated in both tasks for almost all the subjects. The activation during task B was more pronounced than task A. The number of activated pixels in task A significantly correlated to that in task B (
r=0.9). SMA proper activation showed no significant right-left difference in both tasks. Other areas, however, were inconsistently activated across the subjects. None of the subjects showed activation of RCZ. Higher activation in RCZ and pre-SMA has been reported to be associated with more complex, sequential, self-paced movement; cognitive process of motor performance; preparation or selection of motor response. Therefore, inconsistent activation of the areas in the present study was compatible with other reports, because the motor tasks consisted of simple, repetitive, externally paced motions. In contrast some studies showed that SMA proper closely related to motor execution. Our findings suggested a more important role of the SMA proper in the control of alternating bimanual movement used in the present study. Further study, however, is necessary to clarify whether this finding is also applicable to a more complex, sequential bimanual motion.
View full abstract