We report nine patients (four with mitral valve disease, three with aortic valve disease, one with atrial septal defect, and one with left atrial myxoma) who underwent minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
The minimally invasive surgery is characterized by the avoidance of full sternotomy and the minimal operative incision. In our cases, this approach provided less incisional pain and hospital stay, but needed a longer period of cardiopulmonary bypass compared to the traditional surgical technique. The advantages of this approach include less postoperative discomfort, earlier mobilization and discharge.
We experienced two cases that demonstrated complications with this approach. This approach provides limited surgical access, which may cause a prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass period, and hinder control of bleeding or arrhythmias, especially in emergency situations. Defibrillator-pacemaker pads that allow for defibrillation, cardioversion and pacing are recommended. The limited surgical exposure can also prevent the surgeon from adequate evacuation of intracavitary air. Therefore, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is required to assess intracardiac air removal. In addition, the anesth-esiologist can not directlty observe left ventricular contractility and filling, thus transeso-phageal echocardiography is essential and useful for the separation from cardiopulmonary bypass.
View full abstract