We used transcutaneous monitoring of carbon dioxide tension for two patients undergoing LVRS and compared of transcutaneous, end-tidal and arterial measurements of carbon dioxide (PtcCO
2, P
ETCO
2 and PaCO
2). The PaCO
2 of each patient was high, 52-91mmHg and 46-60mmHg, respectively. The P
ETCO
2-PaCO
2 gradients of these patients were 10-35mmHg and 7-15mmHg, respectively. However, the PtcCO
2-PaCO
2 gradients of these patients were smaller and within 5mmHg of each other. PtcCO
2 monitoring cannot take the place of P
ETCO
2 because it can not show the change in each breath. But these results show that PtcCO
2 monitoring is more useful than P
ETCO
2 for patients with ventilation-perfusion mismatching, such as during LVRS.
View full abstract