In July 2020, the enforcement regulations of the laws regulating real estate companies were partially amended, making prior explanation using flood hazard maps mandatory for transactions of residential land and buildings. However, the flood hazard maps currently prepared are based on maximum damage assumptions to encourage evacuation. Therefore, there are various problems when they are used to select residential areas.
Therefore, in order to ascertain an actual situation, a questionnaire and interviews were conducted with consumers and real estate companies in Tokushima Prefecture. As a result, the following three problems were identified. First, current explanations using flood hazard maps may mislead consumers about flood risks. Second, consumers can evaluate convenience items but not safety itemas, and in addition they cannot accurately assume damage conditions and evacuation routes. Third, consumers' assessment of safety is affected not only by depth of inundation, but also by cost of the residential area.
To solve the above issues, following three points were examined to realize a society in which everyone can choose residential areas based on an appropriate understanding of disaster risk: first, a mechanism to promote understanding of multi-hazard risk; second, the relationship between inundation depth and building damage and recovery costs; and third, the need to provide information on evacuation routes. Based on this study, the committee indicated how new flood hazard maps and other information should be utilized.
View full abstract