The steady implementations of the obligations under the Minamata Convention on Mercury will function effectively to reduce atmospheric mercury emissions. This paper summarizes the current status of emission factors, abatement technologies, and countermeasures for five source categories listed in Annex D of the Convention. For stational coal combustion, the co-benefits of climate change measures such as higher efficiency, carbon capture, shift to non-fossil fuels are significant. The replacement of the electrostatic precipitator to a fabric filter and activated carbon injection can significantly heighten mercury removal efficiency. The main mercury-specific abatement technologies in non-ferrous metals production are the Boliden-Norzink process and activated carbon adsorption, and a shift to the hydrometallurgical process is also seen to reduce mercury emissions. In cement clinker production plants, a key question is how to remove mercury circulating in kilns, so in the future manufacturers will be forced to decide between extraction to mercury-enriched kiln dusts or wastewater. With regard to the best available techniques (BAT) for the flue gas treatment of waste incineration plants, the combination of fabric filters, activated carbon adsorption and wet scrubbers will become mainstream for the future, although wet scrubbers have a disadvantage in terms of energy recovery. Cost estimation including measures for not only atmospheric emissions, but also releases to land and water, and waste disposal and management will also play an important role for technology selection.
View full abstract