The U. S. state of Alaska is home to many small native villages, many with no road access. In addition to geographical challenges such as transportation costs and climate change impacts, household waste disposal in remote areas also presents social challenges that are difficult to address within the existing legal framework. Therefore, in addition to the village governments that are institutionally responsible entities, outside entities such as the Arctic Council, indigenous groups, and non-profits, also play an important role. Under these circumstances, it is necessary to confirm not only the voice of supporters but also how the problem is being perceived by concerned local people. While the results of the questionnaire survey did not reveal major discrepancies between the parties, it did suggest that: (1) the types of problems differ depending on regional differences; (2) state regulations and indigenous norms in the handling of animal remains differ; and (3) there seems to be a relation between changes in subsistence activities and disposal sites. There is great significance in redefining village waste management as an Arctic issue, though previously it had been considered a local issue. It raises awareness among the international community while at the same time teaches that recognizing these specific differences among regions, and how local people in these areas address their problems, can be and important tool for navigating solutions in the future.
View full abstract