I have developed a “mutual evaluation table” and some learning activities using this tool.
In the learning activities using the mutual evaluation table, students evaluate themselves and are also evaluated by others based on the criteria in the evaluation table, and write comments on those evaluations.
The purpose of this report is to clarify the relationship between the evaluation criteria set for learning tasks and scientific literacy, and how self-evaluation activities can contribute to the development of students’ scientific literacy, focusing on self-evaluation activities, in particular, one of the learning activities using the evaluation table.
In the process of this study, I analyzed questionnaires about this practice for students, self-evaluation scores, and comments from students in submitting the first experiment reports, and also the scores and comments in submitting the rewritten reports. Then, I examined students’ comments comparing the first and the second reports, and analyzed the score changes and the quality of the comments.
As a result, improvements were seen and significant effects of this practice were recognized in all aspects of students’ scientific literacy, as compared with the case before the introduction of the evaluation table.
Analysis of students’ comments comparing the first and the second comments shows improvements in students’ scientific literacy in terms of their abilities to (1) recognize scientific questions and to (2) explain phenomena from a scientific point of view.
The analysis also shows the changes in students’ comments: simple comments expressing just impressions like “it was fun” evolved to those explaining in detail what kind of skills they learned.
This practice suggests that proactive learning can be expected when students can feel their progress through reviewing their own learning activities and becoming conscious of their meanings.
View full abstract