The purpose of this study was to clarify organize, re-present, and outline the subject of research on the teaching of argumentation in science education conducted in Japan to date, and to clarify the trends and prospects for future study. Fifty articles published in Journal of Research in Science Education, Journal of Science Education in Japan, The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, Research Journal of Teaching and Learning Materials, Journal of Energy and Environmental Education were included in the search up to and including September 2023, as well as university bulletins, center bulletins, and bulletin of affiliated schools during all periods. Of these, thirty-four studies on instructional practices of the argument were classified according to whether they targeted products or processes, and, further, were typified according to whether they were written or oral. The trends in the numbers and content of the studies were examined. It was clarified that 60% of the studies were on written arguments as production consisting of claim, evidence, and reasoning. From these, the necessity of step-by-step instruction structured by the components of arguments was derived. On the other hand, the number of studies on oral and writing argumentation as a process is currently few, suggesting that future research in this area is required. For the sixteen studies other than those on instructional practices, we categorized them in terms of teachers’ beliefs, learners’ attitudes, and analysis of previous research. Since the teacher’s beliefs in teaching the argument and the learners’ argument structures and awareness influence each other, it was suggested that activities that allow practical confirmation of the significance of argumentation skills and their teaching methods be actively incorporated into teacher education.
View full abstract