The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of the formulation framework on the development of learners’ scientific expression by conducting junior high school science classes with and without the formulation framework of learning activities that incorporate instruction on the formulation of consideration descriptions, using a peer evaluation activity. To achieve this goal, we analyzed the learners’ investigation questions, their impressions of the class, and their responses to the questionnaire. From our analysis, the following three points became clear. (1) In learning activities that incorporate instruction on the formulation of consideration descriptions via peer evaluation activity, the use of a formulation framework encouraged students to rewrite their reports and, in doing so, improve upon their scientific expression. The group that incorporated the formulation of consideration descriptions framework produced reports including elements of results (data), claims (conclusions), and evidence (reasons) for the experiment in reductions; further, these learners were able to connect the results (data), claims (conclusions), and evidence (reasons) in this order. (2) The students’ understanding of how to write and order their consideration descriptions and their awareness of the ease of writing consideration descriptions through learning activities that incorporate instruction on their formulation was improved under the peer evaluation activity using the formulation framework. (3) One of the reasons for this improvement was that the students became aware of the ease of communicating their consideration descriptions to others as well as to themselves; in doing so, they increased their sense of competency of the content, writing style, and order of their consideration descriptions, as well as their efficacy expectations. Furthermore, the learners increased their outcome expectations that they could write consideration descriptions that were easy to communicate to others and appropriately expressed which may have increased their motivation. In contrast, no such improvements in scientific expression, sense of competency, or motivation was seen in the control group that did not use the formulation framework.
View full abstract